By NATARIO McKENZIE
Tribune Business Reporter
nmckenzie@tribunemedia.net
THE FNM’s deputy leader yesterday said he could not support Cable Bahamas’ bid for a 27 per cent increase in the price of its basic pay-TV package, suggesting it delay this for “another year or so”.
K Peter Turnquest, who is also the East Grand Bahama MP, said it was “disappointing” that Cable Bahamas had relaunched its bid for an increase given the current financial reality faced by most Bahamians.
However, he backed the BISX-listed communications provider’s decision to launch its ‘Prime Local’ package of six channels, as the $10 per month service would be accessible to lower income families.
“I agree with the local package, I agree with that. I think that is something that can be accessible to lower income families,” Mr Tuenquest said.
“Of course, it would be good if they could service the entire Bahamas. Be that as it may, I think the limited package would work for lower income packages.”
Simultaneously with ‘Prime Local’s launch, Cable Bahamas has reintroduced its bid for a 27 per cent increase in the price of its basic pay-TV package.
The ‘Prime Local’ compromise seems to have (for the moment) won over the regulators. The Utilities Regulation & Competition Authority (URCA) rejected Cable Bahamas’ December 11, 2012, application for this exact same increase, and ‘Prime Local’ is clearly designed to counter the rationale that URCA employed in its February 2013 rejection of Cable Bahamas’ first bid for price increases related to its basic TV package.
URCA’s logic then was founded on the fact that Cable Bahamas had failed to comply with its legal obligations to provide ‘affordable basic television services to all populated areas and specified institutions’.
Cable Bahamas, though, argued that the regulator was mistaken to link its universal service obligations (USO) to the basic pay-TV price increase bid, with the BISX-listed company appealing the decision to a recent hearing of the Utilities Appeals Tribunal (UAT).
Mr Turnquest sided with URCA’s previous decision, saying: “The increase they are trying to get on the basic package is certainly disappointing given the current circumstances.
“With the addition of VAT on top of that, who are the people supposed to be able to afford these increases? BTC is coming along with its product, and maybe the competition will be good, but an increase at this stage is not something I can support.
“I don’t think it’s an economic matter for them [Cable Bahamas]. I think they ought to concentrate on the service and the product they are delivering to the Bahamian people, and let’s talk about these increases in another year or so, but with all that is going on this is not the time for any increases.”
The current strategy is for Prime Local to be launched into the four islands where Cable Bahamas is seeking the 27 per cent basic pay-TV price increase - New Providence, Grand Bahama, Abaco and Eleuthera.
Bahamian consumers would be facing the prospect of $8 and $14 monthly increases in the cost of basic pay-TV services here only.
Together, these fouyr islands comprise 91 per cent of the Bahamian population, but Cable Bahamas’ market/island segmentation strategy means that the current monthly basic prices of $30 and $50, respectively, for business and commercial customers would remain unchanged on Andros, Bimini, the Berry Islands, San Salvador, Great Inagua and Long Island.
Cable Bahamas has argued that the losses incurred in providing the basic pay-TV service will continue to grow and threaten “the economic viability of the service”.
It has consistently argued that the monthly basic pay-TV price has remained unchanged since 1994, and increased programming costs make it impossible to comply with URCA’s requirements when it comes to the regulated cost of capital employed on the service.
Prime Local’s line-up, though, may not be sufficiently attractive to Bahamians. It will only offer ZNS, Jones Communications (JCN), a weather channel, PBS, the Parliamentary Channel and the Bahamas Christian Network.
While agreeing that the monthly $10 charge for Prime Local appeared affordable, URCA said Cable Bahamas needed to offer more flexible payment arrangements for one-off, upfront costs such as security deposits and installation. The issue will now go to public consultation.
Comments
Well_mudda_take_sic 9 years, 11 months ago
6 channels with rubbish content! Cable Bahamas has abused the generous monopoly terms it received from day one and Bahamians are now in dire need of competitors to choose from where market forces (not government) will determine the winners and losers. Great variety in quality programming at affordable prices for the consumer can only come from an intensely competitive environment for the provision of internet and cable TV services. The Australian and Scandinavian models have proven a great success for the consumers in those countries, unlike the U.S. model which is not much different from our own when it comes to granting regional monopolies. URCA's overriding mandate is to ensure consumers of internet and cable TV services in the Bahamas are not gouged by unfair progamming changes and pricing practices whilst promoting a level playing field for new entrants in order to encourage a healthy competitive landscape in this sector of our economy. The jury is still out on URCA.
TalRussell 9 years, 11 months ago
http://tribune242.com/users/photos/2014…
Greentea 9 years, 11 months ago
Cable Bahamas has a terrible product and should not be allowed to price gauge the Bahamian people before competition enters the market for the substandard service they provide. Two hundred channels is really the same seventy channels three times. Blackouts on free stations like CBC during the world cup was the last straw for me. Cable tells me that I have to accept the feed they provide - spanish stations and all- but don't let me access the feed I have paid for when they want me to pay extra for a repackaged product- I already have access to based on my subscription to them- which they then block to prevent me from accessing it- Ridiculous.
Sign in to comment
OpenID