By NEIL HARTNELL
Tribune Business Editor
nhartnell@tribunemedia.net
The Government’s 50 percent VAT rate slash on imported unprepared foods will place Bahamian farmers at “a serious disadvantage” and is counter to its sector policy, an agricultural entrepreneur argued yesterday.
Caron Shepherd, the Bahamas Agro Entrepreneurs Group’s president, told Tribune Business that the Davis administration’s bid to further ease the cost of living crisis for Bahamian consumers via a VAT break for the entire supply chain will make it even more challenging for local farmers and producers to compete on price with lower-cost imports.
Pointing out that Bahamian agriculture is still faced with having to import raw materials, fertilizers, animal feed and equipment at the standard, higher 10 percent VAT, she urged the Government to “immediately” cut or eliminate this levy entirely to enable local farmers to be more competitive and reduce their operating costs.
And, asserting that farmers always seem to face “an uphill fight” with the Government, Ms Shepherd said the imported food VAT cut again seemed to run counter to the Government’s official agricultural policy of boosting domestic production, reducing food imports by up to 25 percent, enhancing food security and retaining more of tourism’s earnings within the Bahamian economy.
Speaking after she wrote a March 9, 2025, letter to Prime Minister Philip Davis KC, outlining her own and the industry’s concerns, she told this newspaper: “This needs to be addressed immediately. It puts the farmers at a disadvantage, at a serious disadvantage, with the disparity between VAT on imported raw foods and on not just what farmers are producing but the stuff they have to buy, bring in and use.
“It puts them at a serious disadvantage. The Government is going to reduce the VAT on certain food items coming in from April 1, but they have yet to give the farmers any VAT relief on raw materials they bring in or fertilizer or tools they need to be able to grow crops and rear livestock.
“The farmer will be at a deficit, having to pay 10 percent VAT upfront and consumers paying 5 percent. The farmers are at a deficit. They [the Government] haven’t thought this thing through properly for the farmers. They need to be able to assist the farmers by reducing VAT on what they import to grow and produce. We’ll have local products that are more expensive than the products that come in with 5 percent VAT on them.”
Ms Shepherd said her pleas to the Government and its agriculture agencies have thus far “fallen on deaf ears”, and she has also failed to gain any movement with suggestions that Customs duties on agricultural inputs also be cut to compensate for VAT.
“It’s unbalanced and working against the broad agricultural sector,” she argued of the present policy position. “It is counter-acting what they are talking. They’re saying one thing for agriculture and then doing something else.
“One one hand they say they’re creating an industry; that industry is already in existence. Now they’re saying they are going to do this, and maintain the imports which they’re trying to diminish and deplete, and telling farmers they are stuck with 10 percent VAT.
“It’s like we fight uphill with the Government whenever it comes to agriculture. Agriculture is not as important as they’re making it out to be... The minister says they’re doing all this for agriculture, but on the other hand they’re putting the last nail in the coffin for the farmer,” Ms Shepherd told Tribune Business.
“It defeats the purpose for the farmers to expand the industry, to grow more, because it’s costing them more to bring in new product compared to imports.” Ms Shepherd, in her letter to the Prime Minister, warned that the 5 percent VAT rate for imported foods without corresponding tax relief for farmers “poses a significant threat to the viability and sustainability of the local agriculture sector”.
She added: “The Bahamian farming community has made considerable strides in contributing to national food security and promoting the ‘Buy Local’ initiative. However, the disparity in VAT treatment between agricultural imports and exports will severely undermine these efforts.
“Currently, agricultural products and seeds imported by local farmers are subjected to a 10 percent VAT rate at the border, whereas the final produce sold locally [will soon be] subject to only 5 percent VAT. This mismatch places an undue financial strain on our farmers...
“We are respectfully seeking clarity on the Government’s strategic considerations regarding the agriculture trade and how this VAT restructuring aligns with national objectives of reducing the country’s food import bill and promoting local food production,” Ms Shepherd continued.
“The higher VAT on critical imports such as seeds, fertilizers and equipment creates a disparity that hinders our ability to compete with imported goods on pricing and quality. Moreover, this imbalance could potentially discourage further investments in agriculture, an industry that is vital to our economy and food independence.”
Apart from impacting the ability of Bahamian farmers to compete on price with rival imports, Ms Shepherd said current policy “contradicts national goals of food security and reducing our dependency on imported food”.
Calling for the reduction or elimination of border VAT on seeds, fertilizers, equipment and other agricultural inputs, so as to lower production costs for Bahamian farmers, she called for the Government to promote greater awareness of local produce and implement industry-friendly policies.
“Supporting the ‘Buy Local’ initiative through government procurement contracts, tax incentives for businesses purchasing from Bahamian farmers, and setting quotas for local produce in food stores and hospitality establishments would provide tangible benefits to the agriculture sector,” Ms Shepherd told the Prime Minister.
“Initiatives to educate consumers on the benefits of buying locally grown produce would further reinforce the ‘Buy Local’ message, boosting demand for Bahamian agricultural products.
“We believe that with thoughtful policy adjustments and collaborative dialogue, the Government can create a balanced approach that fosters a thriving agriculture sector while achieving its fiscal objectives. We would welcome the opportunity to discuss this matter further and contribute to a policy framework that benefits both Bahamian farmers and the nation as a whole.”
Comments
Sickened 2 weeks ago
Davis and his team simply doesn't have the mental capacity to look at multiple sides of an issue and to make an informed decision. PLP - clowns at a funeral.
whatsup 2 weeks ago
WTF ....the Vate is 5% reduction (which is nothing) NOT 50% Should be 100% on food. Greedy politicians
birdiestrachan 2 weeks ago
It is good better than the Fnm with their 60percent increase in VAT and bread basket items that benefited bakeries hotels and fast food But no matter what there are those who will find fault that is just the way it is
whatsup 1 week, 6 days ago
That was greedy and stupid minnis
DonAnthony 2 weeks ago
The vat on food should be and could be ZERO except for the greedy PLP politicians who wasted $58 million on extravagant travel. Shameful.
whatsup 1 week, 6 days ago
AGREED
birdiestrachan 2 weeks ago
Don it is to bad the Fnm party increased VAT on food 60percent. Now you all want to pay zero.. the FNM theme song they trave to much like parrots. Perhaps they should learn the 23.psalm and repeat that what say you Don you are all right even if I am right and you are wrong. Just smile no reply needed
whatsup 1 week, 6 days ago
That was greedy and stupid minnis and why he did not get re-elected and should resign for what he did to our country, the facts are not out and he still won't go away. Evil Bill Gates was his buddy during the pandemic
ohdrap4 2 weeks ago
Whatever VAT they pay the farmers offset with what they collect. The vat is not theirs to keep. The letter is stupid.
ThisIsOurs 2 weeks ago
She's not looking at VAT as revenue. She's saying removing the VAT makes the price of an imported product more attractive than a locally grown product. (Though I'm not certain of the rationale since VAT is removed from local products as well)
Unfortunately it's the wrong fight. Nobody should be fighting to make healthy food (assuming most farm grown will fall into that category) more expensive.
She does go on to say though that the govt should be looking for more ways to lower the cost of inputs for local farmers and that is the right approach. Subsidies to farmers is also an option but I doubt we have the capacity or the markets to do it. In the chaos created by Donald Trump in cancelling "evil" USAID for example, it was highlighted that some farmers' entire crop is grown just for the USAID program, up to 380million (not certain if that's a US total figure or a figure for a single state, but the point is it's a huge number, missed by Elon Musk chaos). The farmers fill a need somewhere in the world and the govt assesses the goodwill earned as worth the subsidy.
Pre Dorian and COVID it was said that 1% growth is growth and people talking about growing the economy didnt know what they were talking about. Because how? And that's the question, with multiple answers all built on the elimination of corrupt high ranking politicians. Growth is our only way out.
ohdrap4 1 week, 6 days ago
In the past I have considered home made goods as a source of income.
The packaging duty is 40 percent. The duty on commercial kitchen equipment is 45%
So it costs a lot to make baked goods at home or preserves as well. I gave up on it as I could not pay myself.
In the past you could see homemade pepper sauce sold in recycled beer bottles, but today's customer wants to see branded custom made bottles saying 'Mike Hot Sauce'.
In addition, the baker has to compete with the large scale processed food brands of cakes and cookies.
Occasionally someone tries selling cakes in the parking lot, but they rarely return.
The same happens with sewing the duty on fabric is 30%, sewing machine parts 45%. So we cannot compete with imported mass produced clothing.
Thing is, govt can produce nothing, ten years of bamsi and 2 years of Golden "Joke". There is nothing to show for it.
DWW 1 week, 4 days ago
agreed, I cam here to raise same question
bogart 1 week, 6 days ago
The Agri President is primarily dealing with the materials in the production stage of manufacturing, a smaller range of end food products which should have been negotiated with the Govt Agricultural store to have the best costs to produce the products locally.
The larger range of imported finished food products range from all sorts of prices from olive oils to vegetable oils, expensive corn beef to cheaper brands and the majority of the food products are not produced locally.
The beloved Bahamaland has risen to be about the sixth most country to live in with the monthly costs have increased large numbers of the population to be lining up at increasing charities who have to obtain and cook hot meals daily for very hungry people.
The govt also assists with the feeding of thousands of meals to school children who do not have the basic breakfast meal.
Kudos to the increasing numbers of churches and other charities and the Govt. to be assisting to be giving the mouthfuls of food to the increasing numbers of the Bahamian needy.
ThisIsOurs 1 week, 6 days ago
-
empathy 1 week, 5 days ago
The response to “eliminate VAT” whenever a crisis mounts shows a complete misunderstanding of how VAT is supposed to work.
Instead of eliminating VAT in the hope of aiding ’needy families’, (or with the intent of scoring political points) government should identify them and provide financial assistance for whatever is required (usually food products and basic essentials). A government should issue those identified a ‘credit card’ approved only to purchase those essential items from local providers. The idea was somewhat utilised when VAT was initiated and has now seemed to have fallen away.
Additionally if government continue to insist on having a “bread basket” list of foodstuff, it should consist of a mix of healthy food items, rich in vegetables and fruits, some of which can be sourced locally, including the seafood and other healthy ‘meats’. That way “local farmers and producers” can benefit.
Sign in to comment
OpenID