0

Kofhe Goodman GUILTY of Marco Archer's murder - Crown will seek death penalty

By Rashad Rolle

KOFHE Goodman has been found guilty of murdering 11-year-old Marco Archer.

Crown prosecutors told the court Friday night they will seek the death penalty for Goodman.

The jury's decision was unanimous after almost two hours of deliberations.

After the verdict, Goodman, 37, asked the court: "That's all?"

He then threatened Marco's family during an expletive-ridden tirade and nearly hopped over the prison dock trying to attack a lawyer, before spitting at the jury as he left the court room.

Outside Marco's grieving family members praised God for the verdict that had been delivered.

Goodman murdered Marco, of Brougham Street, between September 23 and September 28 of 2011.

It had been like a bizarre scene from a horror movie at the closing of the trial last night as Goodman responded to the guilty verdict by threatening the family of Marco Archer, spitting in the face of a female member of the jury and nearly hopping over the prison dock in a failed attempt at attacking the prosecutors.

Police rushed to restrain Goodman when, in the middle of his expletive-ridden tirade, he launched himself into the air and nearly landed outside the prison dock.

Gasps and screams could be heard inside the courtroom and prosecutors hastily rose from behind their desks and prepared to seek protection.

Although officers ran to restrain Goodman, they were not able to prevent him from spitting in the face of a woman as he was being escorted outside the court.

The woman retaliated by attacking Goodman.

Police officers had to restrain her as they escorted Goodman outside the court where he continued to wrestle with the officers.

Inside it was still tense as Justice Bernard Turner insisted that jury members remain in their positions while jurors consoled the visibly upset woman in whose face Goodman had spat.

Jurors had listened to testimonies from 18 witnesses during the nearly five month long trial and spent much of Friday listening to Justice Bernard Turner’s summary of the court proceedings before retiring to the jury room to consider their verdict.

In the end, it took them less than two hours to reach a decision.

After the verdict was finally read, prosecutors informed Justice Bernard Turner that they will be seeking the death penalty for Goodman.

Goodman could then be heard saying: “That’s all?”

The verdict was a relief that the family of Marco Archer struggled to put into words.

His mother, Tryphemia Meadows, fought back tears as she hailed divine intervention for the verdict in a trial she said was full of setbacks.

“He’s guilty. He’s guilty and he deserved it,” she said, adding: “Definitely a relief. We’ve been coming to court for four months, it’s definitely a relief. But we had no doubt they would’ve found him guilty cuz he is.

“This is the first step into the family healing. This doesn’t bring back Marco at all but this is the way for the family to find a way to heal and live with the fact that he is gone.

"It gives some relief to know that he wasn’t taken from us and the person who did it didn’t pay the price. It’s obvious now that Marco was a sacrifice. He was a sacrifice to get that man off of the streets so that he don’t do it to anybody else.”

She said: “Who have been watching this case, following this case and see what happen today could see that man is definitely a beast and he does not deserve to be on the street to touch any other innocent child. We thank God for strength and endurance. We thank God for the judge; he has patience like Job, God has to be in him. We thank God for the prosecution team and the jurors. We had doubts but God was on this from the beginning to the end,” she said, adding: “The lies and everything that happen throughout this trial from the defence lawyer, nothing worked. I mean I never saw so much mess in a courtroom for how that man carry on just to get this criminal back on the street but God is in control.”

Responding to the prosecution’s notice that they will be seeking the death penalty, she said: “I am happy. I am happy. We are happy with that. Marco was 11’ he was taken from us. A lot of children was damaged through this man.”

Comments

Shirley 11 years, 3 months ago

Great! One less scumbag to worry about.

TheObjectiveVoice 11 years, 3 months ago

Old dirty dog, I hope he rots in hell. He only acted like the animal he is and we could only imagine that if he acted like this in the court of law, what in the world did he put that poor boy through... Let him go sleep with Bubba tonight.. he like that kind of stuff... dirty doggg. Kill that poor boyyy and have no remorse. If there is one time where we need to enforce capital punishment, it's this time... no sitting up on death row until you die of old age or a heart attack. This one got to go... dirty, scumbag, pedophile, bastardddd!!! Yes, he is a murdering pedophile and the good book says what will happen to anyone who touches even the hair of His little ones... You goin' downnnn.

lazybor 11 years, 3 months ago

we won't miss himhttp://tinyurl.com/c7l9ck6" width="1">

superUser 11 years, 3 months ago

So lets get this straight:

-They are not even 100% certain that the body is who they think it is.

-There was other unknown DNA on the clothes/body but they never checked the parents DNA.

-The clothes and body were found in trash around a condominium - more than 1 occupant and not gated I presume?

-DNA from the accused was found on the clothes/body in the trash (his DNA would be in the trash anyway)

-The judge says the case against the accused is "circumstantial"

-A juror physically attacked the accused, and was not arrested?

-The parents say this is divine intervention from god

Wow, yes it sounds like a pretty solid case with level-headed jurors.

He must be guilty.

Bre007 11 years, 3 months ago

-The was convincing DNA evidence that the body found was the offspring of Tryphemia Meadows (Marco's mother). -If the parent's DNA were found on Marco's body or clothes that would hardly be irregular. As they would be expected to have contact with him. On the other hand, it is definitely a red flag that Kohfe's DNA was on Marco's clothes as he had no reason to be in contact with the child. -Marco's body was found wraped in a sheet with a distinctive rose pattern. The fitted sheet with the same pattern was found on Kohfe's BED. -Just because evidence is circumstantial does not mean it is incapable of being damning. When you have multiple pieces of circumstantial evidence and you put it together the chance of a coincidence diminishes and an inference of guilt can be drawn. Indirect evidence can be sufficient to convict as this case pointed out. -Kohfe spat on a juror provoking her to attack. Personally I think to spit on another person is vile and disgusting. What would you have done?

superUser 11 years, 3 months ago

-Rose patterned sheet that can be bought locally by anybody at any store?

-The accused DNA was in the trash also, so it is probable that it also could have gotten on the body or clothing just from being in the trash.

-Circumstantial evidence is just that, it is NOT damning - the case against him would have been thrown out in any first world country, perhaps his lawyer just sucked that bad or the jurors made up their mind already.

-As a law abiding citizen, I would have let the police handle it. Unless my life is in danger I do not have the legal or moral right to attack anyone else - was she "defending" her life against the spit which was already, spat?

The evidence was weak, police work was sloppy, parents called their kid a "sacrifice" and cited "God". It is amazing the case actually made it this far.

It seems very easy in the Bahamas to frame another person for murder, and for that person to get the death penalty. Everybody in the Bahamas better start locking down their trash, since it seems that is all it takes, and in other cases all it takes is hearsay.

Regarding the Death Penalty, The Brits will never allow that. It is time we released ourselves from the British Privy Council, they cannot handle their own country yet they try to dictate to us.

digimagination 11 years, 3 months ago

Only worth seeking the death penalty if they seriously intend to carry out same - would save paying for his accommodation and food at HMFHP for the next several years... Having said that I don't fancy his long-term chances as an inmate so it probably doesn't matter.

Sign in to comment