0

Ingraham advice on Baha Mar

EDITOR, The Tribune.

The policy of Governments of The Bahamas of subjecting the necessary arrangements for foreign direct investment projects as agreed between the Government and the Investor to executed agreements between them reflects the huge importance of such projects to the economic growth and development of The Bahamas. The practice of tabling such agreements in Parliament adds a critical layer of transparency to the affair.

I have, therefore, found the present Government’s efforts to unilaterally and in a very public way revisit terms contained in the Heads of Agreement between the Government and Baha Mar especially worrisome. The provision setting out the Government’s commitment to pay some $45.3 million as the Government’s contribution to specified infrastructural work (ie the new diverted West Bay Street related utility infrastructure and landscape) was contained in the first agreement signed in 2005 on the watch of the first Christie-led Government.

Section 11.2 of that agreement provides as follows:

“…The current estimated cost by Baha Mar of such work is approximately $90 million (inclusive of all designs, engineering and supervision costs but exclusive of the $16 million for cost of the reverse osmosis plant which shall be paid for by Baha Mar), Baha Mar agrees to pay for the cost of such work beyond Government’s commitment to spend $53.3 million plus budgeted costs of the John F Kennedy Connector Road); provided, however, that if the total expenditure for such public infrastructure work by Baha Mar and the Government is determined by Baha Mar and the Government to be less than $70 million (inclusive of design, engineering and supervision costs) then Baha Mar agrees that the total amount expended shall be allocated 50 per cent (50%) to each party. Provided further that Baha Mar shall not be responsible for the cost overruns occasioned by Government-initiated change orders…”

When the Government which I led came to office in 2007, it fell to us to complete negotiations and conclude a Supplementary Agreement with Baha Mar to take into account the developers’ interest in doubling the size of their investment from some $1 billion to $2.6 billion. The supplemental agreement tabled in the House of Assembly in February 2008 reflected improved terms for the Government conditioning the Government’s financial contribution on infrastructure works of up to $45.3 million in respect of the proposed new diverted Bay Street as follows:

• When the concrete superstructure of the 1,000-room casino hotel is constructed 100 feet above grade; and

• Baha Mar and its partners, and not the Government, were to bear the cost of burying all the utility lines on the JFK Connector Road;

The matter did not rest there and subsequently, with the entry of the China Export Import Bank and the China State Construction Engineering Corporation as replacements for Baha Mar’s original American partners and financiers a new Novated and Amended Agreements was concluded and tabled in the House of Assembly in February, 2011.

This final Agreement restated the commitments and obligations of the Government and Baha Mar including the higher standard introduced into the Agreement in 2008. Section 15.1.2 of the Novated Agreement as regards the payment for the diverted new West Bay Street provides as follows:

“The Project Company shall complete the new John F Kennedy Drive Connector Road (the “JFK Connector”), the new diverted West Bay Street and public infrastructure relating or appurtenant thereto to mutually agreed specifications and to a standard which would complement the Project in a manner consistent with the Project Plan for the Project complete with suitable landscaping, lighting, signage, drainage, footpaths, jogging trails, etc. The current estimated cost by the Project Company of such work is approximately $90 million (inclusive of all design, engineering and supervision costs but exclusive of $16 million for the cost of the reverse osmosis water plant and sewerage treatment plant which shall be paid for by the Project Company), and the Project Company agrees to pay the entire cost of such work and the Government agrees to reimburse the Project Company for (i) $45.3 million of the total cost expended by the Project Company in respect of such work and (ii) the entire budgeted cost of the JFK Connector, which the Government confirms is $2.8 million, once the concrete superstructure of the 1,000-room Casino Hotel is constructed 100 feet above grade; provided, however, that if the total expenditure for such public infrastructure work by the Project Company is determined by the Project Company to be less than $70 million (inclusive of all design, engineering and supervision costs), then the Project Company agrees that the total amount expended shall be allocated fifty per cent (50%) to each party and the Government’s obligation to reimburse the Project Company shall be adjusted accordingly; provided further that the Project Company shall not be responsible for cost overruns occasioned by Government-initiated change orders or other additional costs occasioned by the Government without the prior approval of the Project Company...”

These terms were agreed by the Government of The Bahamas, the owners of Baha Mar, that is, the Izmirlian Family, and State-owned agencies of the People’s Republic of China.

Having been a part of the good faith negotiation of some of these Agreements with these investors, I am saddened to see the good name of The Bahamas as a trustworthy and transparent jurisdiction in which to conduct business threatened by a tedious, vexatious effort by its Government to delay meeting its agreed financial obligations to this important project.

I understand that it has been intimated that this action being taken by this Government should be seen in the context of the benefit it is seeking to secure for the Bahamian people through the realisation of savings in relation to this signed Agreement. I submit that the harm this action portends for the Bahamian people and their economic prospects by the destruction of goodwill and trustworthiness that it represents may be unimaginable.

I extend my personal apologies to the Izmirlian family and in particular to Mr Dikran Izmirlian and to the Government of the People’s Republic of China. China has proven to be a good friend to The Bahamas and to the Bahamian people since the establishment of diplomatic relations between our two countries in 1997.

I sincerely hope and trust that this embarrassing situation will be expeditiously concluded by The Government.

HUBERT A INGRAHAM

August 11, 2013,

Nassau

Comments

jackflash 11 years, 3 months ago

Who would invest here if they can't trust the government once it changes.

I think that in short order we will be in big trouble as no new foreign investments will happen.

Investors will be scared what one government agreed to the next will rescind.

Does anyone have a good 'grits and gravy recipe'.

farouq231 9 years, 9 months ago

Very useful post. This is my first time i here. I found so many interesting stuff in your blog especially its discussion. Really its great article. Keep it up.

Android World

سيارات

tommglass 9 years, 8 months ago

The Government should implement new investment projects, which may have a huge importance to the economic growth and development of the region. A good example can be seen in the private sector, where business owners prefer to collaborate with specialized financial and accounting experts, like the http://www.etonien.com/">Interim CFO specialists, to implement together new profitable projects, to be assisted in improving the business operational efficiency and so on.

kenulorsen 9 years, 7 months ago

Maybe for small businesses it is very important that the Government to be involved in the economic sector in order to make new investments, from which they will also have some benefits. But these business owners should also learn how to maximize profits, minimize losses and efficiently recover NSF checks because the Government can not always subsidize the private sector. The best source to learn these things can be found at http://www.globalcheckrecovery.com/reso…">http://www.globalcheckrecovery.com/reso…. Any businessman who used it, didn't have any regrets.

loopkelly 9 years, 6 months ago

A business can increase its profits only if it collaborates with the right services or it makes the right investments. For example, many businessmen are very pleased with the credit mail marketing strategies, which can be accessed at http://www.creditmailexperts.com/index.…">http://www.creditmailexperts.com/index.… because they have had the highest return on investment for a mail product. This is just an example how your money can be wisely reinvested.

loopkelly 9 years, 6 months ago

The online environment has a lot of potential these days. A business can improve its sales only by creating an additional online store or another company can promote its specialized services and introduce new offers to the potential clients. It is definitely a source of success, but in order to use it, the company must have capable employees who know how to use the latest technology. Therefore, a businessman will find at http://www.mlpt.com/">http://www.mlpt.com/ an effective corporate training, which offers a systematic approach to solving workplace problems and to improve human-technology interaction.

loopkelly 9 years, 6 months ago

If someone is really interested in such topics, he can find more international news, but not only these types of news, at http://www.dailydissident.com/category/…">http://www.dailydissident.com/category/…. This online newspaper is so great because it is daily updated and the way that the redactors write each article is impersonal and full of useful information.

loopkelly 9 years, 5 months ago

A Government can help some businesses grow, but only if it releases a national plan, including a financial support for helping an economic sector to grow. There are a few businesses which don't need such help, because they do just fine. For example, collecting http://brucemacdonaldstamps.com/">commemorative stamps can be considered a business for someone, but he will never get the Government financial support for doing this activity.

Sign in to comment