By NEIL HARTNELL
Tribune Business Editor
nhartnell@tribunemedia.net
The Government has agreed to “roll back” the 1 per cent Customs administrative processing fee in Freeport to help facilitate the long-proposed $250 million expansion at the Freeport Container Port, Tribune Business was told last night.
Multiple business and political sources said the Government had agreed to lift the fee, part of the tax increase package unveiled in the 2013-2014 Budget, following the meeting in London between Prime Minister Perry Christie and senior Hutchison Whampoa executives.
The Hong Kong-based conglomerate is the Container Port’s 51 per cent majority owner, but both it and the facility’s main customer, Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC), had been left reeling by the 1 per cent processing fee’s imposition.
But, while optimistic, those contacts spoken to by Tribune Business remained sceptical that the fee would be removed for Freeport, saying no written confirmation of such a move had been received.
“We were told last Friday they’d agreed to roll it back,” one source told Tribune Business, speaking on condition of anonymity.
The Freeport Container Port had been the subject of recent discussions between the Government and Hutchison Whampoa, the expansion having been on the ‘drawing board’ for many years.
“Because of the tariff issues, Hutchison had said: ‘To hell with it’, as did MSC,” the source added.
The $250 million Phase V expansion is intended to give the Freeport Container Port a total quay length of 1,536 metres, plus a yard area of 63 hectares.
It will have dock depth of 15.5 metres, nine post-Panamax cranes and one super-post-Panamax quay crane, and be one of the few ports off the US eastern seaboard capable of accommodating the huge post-Panamax ships set to start emerging from the Panama Canal in 2013.
K P Turnquest, the FNM MP for east Grand Bahama, also confirmed to Tribune Business that he had heard a compromise over the 1 percent Customs processing fee had been reached for Freeport.
“I understand they agreed, but are waiting for it in writing,” he said of the two sides. “They’re waiting for the pieces to fall into place. No doubt we’ll hear about it.”
The 1 per cent Customs processing fee was among the 2013-2014 Budget tax increases that the Grand Bahama Chamber of Commerce, and Grand Bahama Port Authority (GBPA) licensees, had aimed to challenge via a Judicial Review action in the Supreme Court.
It is understood that the Chamber has held off, at present, to give time for the GBPA and others to negotiate with the Government and see if this will bear fruit.
Mr Turnquest, meanwhile, said he understood the Government was in talks with several parties over the 1 per cent Customs administrative processing fees, and supposed to make an announcement pre-Christmas.
He added that this particular fee had been “a major contention with MSC, and the expansion of the Container Port hinges on that”.
“I know MSC is supposed to be bringing big Panamax vessels here, and it’s very important it gets sorted out,” Mr Turnquest said.
“When you consider that Grand Bahama has developed into a maritime industry hub, you can’t have these kind of fees that make it more expensive for these carriers to operate, and the includes aviation carriers.
“We have to be careful how we impose these fees and levies. There’s no doubt we stand to lose business as a result, and stand to lose more, and it would be very short-sighted for us to look at short-term gain and the expense of long-term vision.”
Mr Turnquest said he understood that the 1 per cent Customs fee had increased MSC’s costs “significantly”, and that it had explored alternatives to reduce them, including determining whether “the environment is conducive to their business model”.
Comments
proudloudandfnm 10 years, 11 months ago
It is a 1% entry processing fee. Less than 1% of MSC's container port cargo is consigned to the Bahamas. Less than 1% get entry's put in. They shouldn't have any issues with the 1%. This article is misleading....
realfreethinker 10 years, 11 months ago
The small businesses in Freeport have a problem with it . That same 1 % has added as much as 20 % in some cases to doing business there
The_Oracle 10 years, 11 months ago
The argument is that Freeport, with it's tax exemptions for businesses under the Hawkbill Creek Agreement, could have all duty paid imports and duty paid sales attract this 1% processing fee, which is structured as a tax, but is being called a fee. This would be nominal with the rest of the Bahamas. Bonded imports however, should not attract this Tax/Fee, under the HCA exemptions from taxes present or future. The Port Authority once again is negligent in safeguarding the HCA and is responsible to its licensees for countering/protecting from the endless PLP and FNM Government attacks on the Statute law that provides for the Port Authorities very existence. If they keep going the way they have been for the last 30 years, this erosion, and the end to exemptions from real property taxes and government Business license fees in 2015 will be the final and fatal blow to what has always held promise for the Entire Bahamas!
B_I_D___ 10 years, 11 months ago
Freeport SHOULD be a MASSIVE hub of activity, and major population centre with all of it's tax benefits...but no...it is a failure, and when all the new tax rules come in, they may as well be some small settlement in the outer islands with a few hundred peple to support.
Sign in to comment
OpenID