By DANA SMITH
Tribune Staff Reporter
dsmith@tribunemedia.net
FOLLOWING the FNM’s call for “full disclosure” on reported PLP links with the Bahamas Petroleum Company, Deputy Prime Minister Philip “Brave” Davis voiced his resentment over the “irrelevant” discussion and branded the opposition’s outcry as an “attempt to taint the character and integrity of myself and others”.
He also denied “further affiliation” with the company.
The opposition had vowed to do everything in its power to block exploratory oil drilling in the Bahamas before comprehensive regulations are put in place and unless any relationship between senior PLPs and the oil industry is revealed.
In a statement release last week, party chairman Darron Cash claimed there were worries the government was simply delivering a “favour to a financial backer.”
Mr Davis, whose law firm had provided services to Bahamas Petroleum prior to Mr Davis taking office, said yesterday: “I have no further affiliation with them. In fact, even before being elected they had already engaged other counsel. I am now in a different capacity and I resent the inference that they (the FNM) will draw.”
That inference, the deputy prime minister explained, is that he would make a decision or be involved in a decision that would “in any way compromise the best interests of our country.”
He also said he thinks the discussion is “irrelevant.”
“What I resent is this attempt to taint the character and integrity of myself and others,” he said.
“I will not point fingers at what happens with persons in their camp but perhaps they need to take the BP out of their own eyes before they start to look at to see whether BP is in somebody else’s eyes. But that’s what I resent – our politics has to be above that.”
Defending the decision to engage in exploratory drilling, Mr Davis said the government is seeking to determine whether or not there is an asset that belongs to the country “that could be exploited with the participation of the people.”
He noted it is a “competitive market” and when asked if the government would consider allowing other companies to enter the industry, he said: “If there are others who are willing to come in and do the same thing that BPC is doing, I think consideration will be given to it.”
Also responding to the FNM’s call for disclosure of how much Mr Davis, the prime minister and Senator Jerome Gomez – or their firms or other related parties – were paid by Bahamas Petroleum, Mr Davis said he didn’t remember the exact amount and added: “It was my firm that got a retainer and we were paid for the work we had done.”
Last week, Mr Gomez insisted he received no campaign donations from the Bahamas Petroleum Company, but refused to disclose how much he was paid as their resident manager.
Mr Christie had admitted last year that he was contracted to consult with BPC about oil exploration in the Bahamas on behalf of Davis & Co before becoming prime minister.
Comments
tinytim 11 years, 7 months ago
Is the opinion of anyone who doesn't want drilling irrelevant ? Is it irrelevant that exploratory drills carry the greatest risk ? Is it irrelevant that the Macondo disaster happened on an exploratory drill ? Mr. Davis, you will certainly be remembered in history if you allow this and it goes wrong !
B_I_D___ 11 years, 7 months ago
The PLP are doing a fine and dandy job of tainting their own reputation...almost daily another WTF story comes out about their foolishness and poor leadership and governing.
Collin 11 years, 7 months ago
Mr. DPM here are your words "Are we not about the truth? Are in the Bahamas not about the truth?" What do you have to hide? You are public figure, simply show us you live by your own words. We simply ask for full disclosure.
Puzzled 11 years, 7 months ago
"Are we not about the truth". What happened to this story "Appeal In Millionaires' Dispute Must Wait Until After Election". This involved our DPM and it seems to have vanished through the Bahamian legal cracks.
proudloudandfnm 11 years, 7 months ago
We need full disclosure from the PM and the DPM on their pay package from BPC. I bet they both have stock options. Why all of a sudden has PGC gone back on his pledge of a referendum? It was ALWAYS ABOUT EXPLORATORY DRILLING. So why is PGC so afraid of a referendum? If he has no horse in this race then give us the chance to vote on it and take the vote.
I have no doubt PGC and Brave still have ties to BPC and the outcome of their drilling will directly affect PGC and Brave's bank account balances....
leeza 11 years, 7 months ago
Thats what we voted for so they will do as they wish, with only their interest at heart. Right now nothing about this administration surprises me, I am most surprised to see that people actually expected some positive things to come from them. They have been tried and proven. So with 4 years and couple months to go I will watch as they stucker whats left of this ecomony. ALL FOR ME BABY GANG IS IN THE HOUSE AND THEY SURELY MAKING SURE THEY STRAIGHTTO HELL WITH THE REST OF US.
Sign in to comment
OpenID