FRED Smith, the Queen’s Counsel attorney, is calling for an overhaul of the political process, saying the time has come for Bahamians to choose their prime minister.
“Under the present system, we have the right to cast one vote, that of our Member of Parliament,” Mr Smith said. “We have absolutely no say in who is prime minister. The party has already chosen its leader through an arcane and archaic process of convention, which is really a big political party with negotiations, and rewarding generals and backbenchers who show allegiance. That’s not reflective of what the public wants or who the public would choose.
“With the leader being chosen by party faithfuls, but not by the public except insofar as electing the most MPs and without checks and balances, that distance between the electorate and the elected leads to unbridled power in the hands of the prime minister who does not have to answer to the people because they never voted for him – or possibly for her – in the first place.”
Mr Smith suggested that ‘unbridled power’ leads to even graver consequences. “You end up with a dictatorship,” he said last week.
“The concentration of power in the office of a leader who is not directly elected by the people is especially abhorrent,” he said, when dealing with business matters “that should be left to business people who know the rules and regulations, the policy and practices and know what to expect instead of having to deal behind closed doors where policy is decided by a Cabinet minister.”
Mr Smith claimed deals made in secret put the country and the investor at risk – and create an atmosphere of suspicion and distrust. He said unchecked power results in decision-making that bars the public from participating in decisions involving their interests, circumventing or blocking their ability to contribute to discussions about developments that may be in their own back yard.
“The Office of the Prime Minister assumes unto itself unlawful powers to be involved in the business dealings of businessmen,” said Mr Smith, who is also chairman of Save The Bays, the environmental advocacy group which is campaigning for greater access to information.
“It is not how a democracy and capitalism and a free market economy work ... politicians are not elected based upon their expertise as businessmen. They should not be involved in the negotiation of business deals between private enterprises.”
The government, he believes, should continue to monitor through regulatory agencies like the Securities Commission and Utilities Regulation and Competition Authority.
“It should also expand its regulatory role with greater protection for the environment with an environmental protection act and should ensure that the Health Safety at Work Act is respected or that the Department of Environmental Health Services is properly staffed and funded to be effective in preventing pollution such as what is happening at Clifton Pier,” he said. “But leave the business of business to businesspeople and let the people decide who should be prime minister.”
How business is conducted and oil pollution at Clifton are subjects of two legal actions filed by Save The Bays.
Comments
duppyVAT 10 years ago
Where was Fred Smith when the Constitutional Commission was getting ideas??????? Is Fred Smith suggesting we create a republic now?????????
TruthHurts 10 years ago
I understand where Smith is coming from.. but unfortunately the person that would stand to get my vote hasn't physically incarnated as yet. These guys we have circulating from party to party are not worth the time and effort. We need REAL LEADERS! Not yes men who are more than happy to bend over backwards and cater to foreign entities that supplement their pockets at the detriment of its own countrymen. No Way!
birdiestrachan 10 years ago
I think Fred smith wants to be Prime Minister. He will do well to take his medication an just calm down.
kairosmatt 10 years ago
I think we need a separate PM or executive as well. I think one of the reasons other parliaments in bigger countries work better (relatively to ours anyways) is because there are so many parties you have to form coalitions and take sides on certain issues with other parties or against other parties etc. Here, one party wins the majority, get the PM position, and has complete control. The opposition just sits there and occasionally slings some mud but generally you're stuck with one set of crooks in total control without any balance from the other ganstas.
DNA really screwed this up by running a bunch of half baked and criminal candidates just to fill out the rooster. They should have just focused on winning a few (3-6? a few more maybe?) seats with excellent candidates, leaving the FNM and PLP more or less tied and then being able to cast the deciding votes. Could really revolutionize our crappy parliament. But, no, it seems to me the DNA are more interested in being just one more gang/tribe with nothing really to add to this political country.
Sign in to comment
OpenID