By NEIL HARTNELL
Tribune Business Editor
nhartnell@tribunemedia.net
A key member of the Government’s Bahamas Telecommunications Company (BTC) negotiating team has pledged it will investigate how Cable & Wireless Communications (CWC) became involved in the privatisation process when it was not among the original bidders.
Emphasising that this did not impugn CWC, which has retained the largest stake in BTC, plus Board and management control, Franklyn Wilson said he was sticking to his original position that the 2011 privatisation was an “horrendously” bad deal for the Government and Bahamian people.
The Sunshine Holdings chairman, though, as he has done before, declined when pressed to go into detail on why the Ingraham administration’s April 2011 sale of a 51 per cent stake in BTC was such a bad deal.
He did, though, blast the Free National Movement’s (FNM) leader, adding: “Dr Minnis will have his day in court to explain why he agreed to what he agreed to.”
It is clear, though, that he and other members of the negotiating committee are moving into ‘high gear’ to sell the revised agreement, which sees CWC donate slightly less than 2 per cent of its stake to The BTC Foundation, where it will be held in trust.
And, while the committee is sticking to its original recommendation that the Government appoint either a Parliamentary select committee, or a Commission of Inquiry, to probe the BTC deal, Mr Wilson did confirm he and his fellow members were looking into how CWC entered the process.
“That is something which the committee will investigate, but that does not implicate Cable & Wireless,” Mr Wilson told Tribune Business.
“If you let me come through the back door, you’ve opened the door for me to come in.”
CWC, and its LIME Caribbean affiliate, were not among the companies that entered the initial 2009 BTC privatisation ‘beauty contest’. Nor were they among the four shortlisted bidders that made it through to the final round.
David Shaw, LIME’s then-chief executive, told Tribune Business in 2011 that CWC initially decided not to enter the process because it was too focused on its restructuring elsewhere in the Caribbean.
That, though, went swifter than planned, and CWC/LIME approached the Government in early 2010 to see whether there was any opportunity to participate.
Julian Francis, BTC’s former chairman and the head of its privatisation committee, told this newspaper at the time that it had worked hard to conclude a deal with the lead bidder of the four finalists, the JP Morgan/Vodafone combination.
However, an agreement was not reached because Vodafone was unwilling to put ‘skin in the game’ by taking an equity stake in the bid, creating fears that it could suddenly exit a management contract and leave BTC exposed without an offering partner.
With all four bids rejected, or dropped out, Mr Francis said it was only then that CWC came into the equation, dispelling the perception harboured by some that the Government was running two parallel privatisation processes.
Mr Wilson, meanwhile, indicated to Tribune Business that his conciliatory remarks towards CWC last Wednesday were intended primarily for consumption by the UK stock market, and investor and analyst community.
This, he added, was done to ensure there was no ‘knee jerk’ reaction to the deal that could send CWC’s stock price tumbling.
And he also dispelled the suggestion, put to him by Tribune Business, that The BTC Foundation’s founder could dissolve this entity at any time and take possession of the assets - namely the 2 per cent stake.
That would have caused major problems if the Government is the founder, but Mr Wilson said: “That is impossible in this case. No one can disturb this. There is no doubt.”
Mr Wilson was also at great pains to talk up the negotiating committee’s, and government’s ‘success’ in getting CWC to agree to the revised deal and place those shares in trust for the benefit of social causes, the crime fight and telecommunications technology.
“I don’t care how you skin the cat; this is a very material transaction in the history of the Commonwealth of the Bahamas,” he told Tribune Business. “Sometimes, Bahamians and people who love the country would do best to say: ‘Well done’ and move on.”
Repeating this theme several times to Tribune Business, the Sunshine Holdings chairman added: “No juxtaposition of stuff, taking things out of context, is going to overcome the fact this is a significant and positive transaction for the Commonwealth of the Bahamas.
“No amount of spin can conceal the fact that this is a very material and positive thing for the Bahamas.”
Again, an explanation as to why this was so was not forthcoming, although Mr Wilson promised he was going to detail this on the radio yesterday.
Comments
proudloudandfnm 10 years, 9 months ago
SO let's get this straight now. The party that vowed they'd get BTC, held a press conference to say that they did indeed get it back, yet when all was said and done did not in fact get it back. Now says the FNM did a bad deal?!?!?
Hmmm.....
banker 10 years, 9 months ago
Does anyone else see the irony of an unelected person, especially a political crony speaking for the government? Is this one of Perry Christie's puppeteers?
realfreethinker 10 years, 9 months ago
You need to find out what he got out of the deal
Islandgirl 10 years, 9 months ago
Are we going to waste more time and money? The treasury, according to the government, is "broke"...In the almost two years you people have been joking around with this, you haven't discovered all the information you wanted?
John 10 years, 9 months ago
The reason why we are staring down the throat of the VAT monster is because this government has been pandering to foreign investors for too long. From way back in the 80's Many of them come here and hand the government a pair of rose colored lenses and the picture looks rosey. Government dips, sometimes deeply into the public purse to fulfill every need, wish and desire of these companies. And many come here rake millions and then skip town leaving the government holding an empty bag in one hand and basket of unpaid bills in the other. When government uses taxpayers money, for example to pay for infrastructure, promotions or the like that is exclusive to Atlantis, for example. Bahamian people are, in fact, subsidizing the vacations of everyone that stays at Atlantis. Poor, broke finding it hard to make ends meet Bahamians are sacrificing to allow someone they don't even know or never met to stay o Paradise. The same is true when buggy loads of concessions are handed out and these foreign companies rake in millions and millions and nothing goes into the public treasury to help service our debt. Take the value of the top 10 foreign companies operating in the Bahamas and the value is easily more than all Bahamian companies added together. BTC was always a cash making entity, in the long term. It provided cash to the government in difficult times . It was sac-religious to sell it off to BTC the way it was done and in manner that it cannot be gotten back, If government continues to dispense of its assets, the VAT will not be sufficient to draw them out of the hole it will dig for itself and the Bahamian people
Sign in to comment
OpenID