By NEIL HARTNELL
Tribune Business Editor
nhartnell@tribunemedia.net
The Government’s unfunded public sector pension liabilities will hit $4.1 billion by 2032 without proper reform, a leading accounting firm yesterday describing this as “unsustainable” and akin to “the iceberg that sank the Titanic”.
KPMG, in its analysis of the 2014-2015 Budget, said the existing $1.5 billion liability associated with unfunded civil service pensions was set to increase by a further $1 billion within the next eight years if the status quo remained unchanged.
With no formal pension fund supporting civil service workers in their retirement, KPMG revealed that the Government is currently covering these costs by paying out $60 million from its recurrent expenditure annually.
And, with another $25 million in staff gratuities having to be completely covered by the Bahamian taxpayer, KPMG said this collective $85 million liability was projected to increase by 64.7 per cent within eight years - hitting $140 million per year come 2022.
KPMG knows from where it speaks, having been contracted by the Ministry of Finance to conduct an assessment of its public sector pension liabilities - both current and projected.
While praising the Government for creating a committee to tackle and oversee public sector pension reform, KPMG’s Budget analysis warned: “The current unchecked growth in defined benefit pension liabilities can be likened to the iceberg that sank the Titanic.......
“Currently, Government employees in the public service receive a defined benefit pension, which is paid out of recurrent expenditures when they retire – in other words, there is no pension fund supporting these payments.”
Explaining the grave implications for the Government’s finances, and the Bahamas at large, if necessary reforms were not implemented, KPMG added: “Public service pension liabilities are estimated at $1.5 billion, increasing to $2.5 billion by 2022 and $4.1 billion by 2032.
“Annual payments out of recurrent expenditures amount to $60 million per annum, with staff gratuities totalling another $25 million.
“It is expected that these will increase to around $140 million by 2022 (less than 10 years away), as more and more current public service employees retire. Clearly, this is unsustainable.”
If the status quo remains, the unfunded public sector pension liabilities threaten to gradually squeeze the life out of the Bahamian economy, as they will potentially consumer ever-increasing tax dollars to fund them - a development that would have grave implications for citizens, the private sector and other areas of government spending.
And, if the Government chose not to meet its obligations, this would have major social consequences for civil service retirees and their families.
KPMG are not the first to express concerns about the public sector’s mammoth unfunded pension liabilities, an issue that has consistently been ‘kicked down the road’ by previous governments who have left it for their successors to deal with.
Raymond Winder, Deloitte & Touche (Bahamas) managing partner, told Tribune Business as far back as 2012 that the Government’s unfunded civil service pension liabilities will “explode” unless urgent reform action is taken.
He suggested in an April 2014 interview that the existing $1-$1.5 unfunded liabilities could lead some observers to suggest that the Bahamas’ national debt, currently pegged at $5.567 billion, was really as high as $6.5-$7 billion.
And Mr Winder told Tribune Business that the Government “cannot tax its way out” of the ticking public sector pensions timebomb, adding that the liabilities were likely “increasing at an alarming rate” annually.
He questioned whether the Bahamas had “the capacity and innovation” to deal with the problem now, rather than wait 10-15 years until it had become unsustainable and allow the likes of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to impose a solution on it.
To tackle the problem, Mr Winder recommended in April that the Government move all new civil service/public sector recruits on to a defined contribution scheme - one where both employer and employee contribute monies to the latter’s pension.
He also suggested that the size of government be reduced to lower the number of pension beneficiaries, with departing civil servants not replaced unless absolutely necessary.
Most troubling, in the immediate sense, is the implications these massive liabilities have for the Government’s overall fiscal position. Given its antiquated cash-based financial reporting system, its financials (balance sheet) do not recognise future spending commitments, including its pension obligations.
Prime Minister Perry Christie announced in the 2014-2015 Budget that the Government was beginning the switch to an accrual accounting system, which would recognise future spending commitments already ‘set in stone’.
But the fiscal deficit and national debt are already being exacerbated by existing civil service pension obligations, as they are being paid out as part of the Government’s recurrent expenditure - a kind of ‘pay as you go’ scheme.
Given that the Bahamian economy’s per annum GDP is estimated at $8 billion, some $1.5 billion in unfunded pension liabilities are equivalent to 18.8 per cent of the former figure.
Adding these to the existing $5.5 billion national debt, and debt-to-GDP ratio of roughly 64 per cent, that puts the latter at over 80 per cent - well above the IMF’s ‘danger threshold’.
Comments
GrassRoot 10 years, 6 months ago
How about a VAT rate of 85%? If you do the math, it would not be enough.....
sheeprunner12 10 years, 6 months ago
The abuse of the civil service system by the politicians since 1967 is finally catching up with us................. and what about politicians who retire with 100% of their salaries as pension??? The average Joe only gets crumbs .............. the largest percent of this liability is a small percent of senior civil servants and retired politicians e.g. Lady Ping, HAI, etc......and those collecting 3 or 4 different pensions aka double dipping.
Well_mudda_take_sic 10 years, 6 months ago
Hubiggity and Vomit have outdone each other when it comes to being the largest players the Bahamas has ever had in the field of corrupt largesse. These two make the old UBP white boys of many moons ago seem like church choir boys when it comes to all that they have afflicted our society with: incessant fear of crime, no jobs for our children, hungry unschooled children, no affordable electricity (many of us back to using candles and kerosene lanterns), prices for healthy food (fruits, vegetables, nuts, etc.) that only our well-fed politicians and their wealthy business cronies and foreign friends can afford, schools in a state of disrepair and without school supplies, inability to travel abroad because of outrageous new airport taxes built into ever increasing airfares, poor quality water and very low water pressure in many neighborhoods, banking fees gone wild, taxes, taxes and more taxes, and on and on. All the while our politicians, or ruling elite as they like to think of themselves, are living the high life off of the wealth they have effectively stolen over the years from hard working poor and middle class Bahamians; the middle class in fact has now been all but decimated. Our politicians have gotten so accustomed to cavorting with their corrupt business cronies and wealthy foreigners that they now want a new parliament building with secure areas like private restrooms so they don't have to mix with us poor dumb stupid voters who they now seem to fear. Meanwhile the Pope has decided to no longer use the secure bullet proof Pope Mobile as he wishes to be closer to the people. Guess our politicians know the sins they have committed against the good hardworking poor people of the Bahamas and, unlike the Pope, have something to fear in being around us.
Reality_Check 10 years, 6 months ago
WORTH REPEATING: All of the existing public sector pension plans (i.e. those of government departments, agencies and corporations) need to be rolled up into one large public sector defined contribution plan. In the case of existing defined benefit plans, the opening or starting balance for each participant in the new defined contribution plan should be based on an equitable pro rata reduction of the vested value of their existing accumulated retirement benefits based on the least generous of all the existing public sector defined benefit plans. In the case of participants in existing defined contribution plans, their opening or starting balance in the new defined contribution plan should equal aggregate contributions made out of their own pocket plus related actual realized earnings thereon to date, plus an equitable pro rata reduced amount in respect of the vested portion of the actual value of their accumulated benefits attributable to any additional contributions made on their behalf by their employer, which reduced amount should be based on the least generous of all the existing public sector defined contribution plans. This approach would give no one a free ride based on age thereby avoiding younger public sector employees and younger Bahamian taxpayers being unduly burdened in the much more difficult times they will have to work as compared to their older public sector colleagues now nearing retirement. Public sector personnel nearing their retirement age who have enjoyed a much better standard of living than their younger colleagues will likely ever experience should not be rewarded by any grandfathering initiatives based on age.....an old timer who has all along lived the very good life and failed to provide for his or her future financial needs should not now be rewarded at the expense of their younger public sector colleagues and the hard working taxpayers of this country. Broad strokes given here, but the details behind creating one new financially viable defined contribution plan covering all public sector employees (including politicians) will need to be hammered out with minimal political and public sector union involvement.
Reality_Check 10 years, 6 months ago
All public sector employees (no matter their age) would participate in the one new defined contribution plan I mentioned above which will need to be a non-contributory plan in the early years (i.e. only contributions by employees deducted by their employer from their pay with no matching or other contributions from the employer) until it is determined the plan will be financially sound for the long-term. Care will have to be taken to ensure the new plan is administered by qualified professionals in the private sector and not by government, otherwise it will go the way that our National Insurance Fund has gone. The new plan would need to be strictly prohibited from making investments that are in any way related or connected to government other than possibly a limited amount of Bahamas Government Stock.
Sign in to comment
OpenID