By AVA TURNQUEST
Tribune Staff Reporter
aturnquest@tribunemedia.net
ATTORNEY General Allyson Maynard-Gibson yesterday expressed her full confidence in the discretion of the Chief Justice and Chief Magistrate amid concerns over the removal of stenographers from the Magistrate’s Court system.
Mrs Maynard-Gibson declined to comment on pending legal action by the Criminal Bar Association over the issue. However, she noted that there has been no “backlash from the victims of crime who wish to have their matters heard expeditiously.”
She added that digital recording will be employed by September.
Opposition Leader Dr Hubert Minnis criticised the government for the “premature” removal of stenographers from the Magistrate’s Court system.
Dr Minnis said that the absence of court reporters presented serious challenges to the appeals process as the accused must rely on the accuracy of handwritten notes, which, he added, were subject to the interpretation of the magistrate.
“The magistrate now has to write everything down by hand,” he said adding that “on average a magistrate can see 25 to 30 cases per day. As the number of cases increases, the handwriting deteriorates. The magistrate might not even be able to interpret his own handwriting. If the magistrate misquotes or writes something different, that’s not fair to the individual being charged.
“The majority of the appeal cases come out of the magistrate’s court so when that goes to the appeal court,” said Dr Minnis, “if the magistrate wrote the wrong thing then it’s unfair to the individual being charged and most of those individuals are over-the-hill residents.
“You truly don’t believe in Bahamians when you’re introducing an archaic, retrogressive system to them,” he added.
Lawyers of the Criminal Bar Association announced their intention to take legal action against Attorney General Maynard-Gibson for removing the stenographers from the Magistrate’s Court on Monday.
The group said that while judges enjoy tenure, magistrates are subject to administrative decisions and unable to voice their opinion on the matter for fear of victimization.
This action comes nearly a month after lawyers called a press conference to protest the removal of court reporters, leaving it to magistrates to take handwritten notes until digital recording comes on stream later this year.
Yesterday, Mrs Maynard-Gibson added: “My team and I are determined to do everything that is within our power to ensure that justice is seen to be done in the Bahamas. The system that is broken, the result of inordinate delays, adjournments, et cetera, that are impacting both accused and victims, is fixed. We are expending all of our energies fixing a system that has been broken, we are determined on behalf on the Bahamian people that the system can be fixed.”
Comments
GrassRoot 10 years, 5 months ago
so why is a stenographer needed, when the files get lost afterwards?
proudloudandfnm 10 years, 5 months ago
This woman is clueless man!! How can you let the stenographers go before you have the digital recorders in place?
And who is going to maintain these digital recorders? Please don't tell me the Bahamas government will be in charge of maintain this new system. That will not happen.
Good job killing those stenographer jobs by the way. Way to promote job growth ya morons....
I swear man. The PLP just can't get away from stupid....
CANDACESCOTT 10 years, 5 months ago
it is mid March and the digital system is "projected" to online in September. smh... I swear this must be the twilight zone....or a bad long dream!
Commonsense242 10 years, 5 months ago
The action is by the Criminal Bar COMMITTEE of The Bahamas Bar Association!
GrassRoot 10 years, 5 months ago
why is the Bar Committee criminal?
TheMadHatter 10 years, 5 months ago
So it will take until September to get some digital recorders? I can get her some by next week Friday if she will prepare a cheque.
Are we living in Zimbabwe ?
TheMadHatter
proudloudandfnm 10 years, 5 months ago
Very true Madhatter.....
B_I_D___ 10 years, 5 months ago
Pretty sad...the courts are already backlogged, and you are now going to throw the court system back into the dark ages for an uncertain amount of time...you know those audio recorders WON'T be going live in September...maybe 2016...so you slow down the wheels of justice by making the magistrate 'take notes'...and you also jeopardize an appeal as you don't have a full transcript to work from...just what the magistrate thought was worthy of jotting down, with varying degrees of accuracy. Wonder how many cases right now are being pushed through on those merits, that you can get a much easier appeal and over-turned ruling.
Sign in to comment
OpenID