0

‘Unreasonable’ to match VAT and price increases

By NEIL HARTNELL

Tribune Business Editor

nhartnell@tribunemedia.net

Businesses should not have timed price increases to coincide with Value-Added Tax’s (VAT) implementation, its Comptroller said yesterday.

John Rolle said the Ministry of Finance was sticking to its position that it was “unreasonable” for the private sector to blame price rises greater than VAT’s 7.5 per cent levy on extra costs related to the new tax.

And Mr Rolle, who is also the Ministry’s financial secretary, told Tribune Business that “reasonable” businesses would seek to recover any VAT-related compliance costs over time, “not in one shot”.

“I would avoid having both timed together,” Mr Rolle said of VAT and price increases designed to boost private sector margins/profits.

“It would not be reasonable to blame increases above and beyond VAT on the tax itself. We accept that in some cases businesses will have fixed costs making the transition to VAT, but in most instances businesses will try and recover those costs over a reasonable amount of time, not in one shot.”

Mr Rolle added that it was also not necessary for Bahamian businesses to increase their prices prior to VAT’s January 1 implementation, as reports suggested many did.

This is because VAT is designed to be paid 100 per cent by the end-consumer, with registrant businesses recovering - or ‘netting off’ - all the tax paid on their inputs (factors of production).

As a result, business margins and mark-ups (on non-price controlled) items should, in theory, not be impacted by the new tax.

Reiterating that the private sector should not seek to recover one-off, upfront compliance costs “one-time straight”, Mr Rolle said: “This is also in the context of anecdotal reports of businesses making adjustments to prices in expectation of VAT-related costs.

“That price adjustment was not reasonable. We don’t expect there to be any adjustments of that nature.”

The VAT Comptroller did not identify any companies by name in his interview with Tribune Business, but his remarks will likely be interpreted as referring to the likes of Galleria Cinemas.

The cinema monopoly increased adult movie ticket prices from $8.50 to $10 on New Year’s Day, of which $0.64 was VAT and the remaining $0.86 a rise imposed by the company.

The total $1.50 increase was a 17.6 per cent increase, with movie tickets for children also increasing from $4.50 to $5 (an extra 11 per cent).

While the increases are hardly “outrageous”, as suggested by Price Control Commission chair, E. J. Bowe, the timing created the impression that Galleria was seeking to ‘camouflage’ the rise with VAT and then blame it all on the new tax.

Mr Rolle, meanwhile, suggested that VAT’s implementation appeared to have made Bahamian consumers much more protective of their rights, taking nothing for granted when making purchases.

The VAT Comptroller described Bahamian shoppers as the Government’s “watchdogs” and “eyes and ears” in both aiding its enforcement efforts, and ensuring businesses complied with the law and were held to account.

“We’re very, very happy with the feedback we’re getting from consumers,” Mr Rolle told Tribune Business.

“They are really the watchdogs in making sure the businesses have VAT registration numbers on their receipts, showing the TIN number and amount of VAT paid.

“Consumers continue to be the eyes and ears of the process.”

Mr Rolle told Tribune Business that VAT’s implementation would impose a new level of discipline on both consumers and the private sector alike.

While the former would likely curb excessive consumption and spending, the VAT Comptroller said the ability of Bahamians to ‘shop around’ - both at home and abroad - would help keep merchant prices in check.

“Most businesses have recognised that consumers have the option of comparison shopping at some level,” Mr Rolle said. “VAT will provide some discipline on the adjustments that will take place.

“It has been said in some cases that local businesses, when they compete, not only do they compete with each other but their counterparts internationally when Bahamians shop abroad, so all these elements are working in this period.”

In other words, the threat of competition - both locally and internationally - should help hold any company intending to ‘price gouge’ in check.

While admitting that the Customs duty reductions implemented on January 1 was “not a big list”, Mr Rolle said the reduced tariff rates would also feed into consumer prices in the coming months.

Comments

B_I_D___ 9 years, 10 months ago

There is a difference between 'unreasonable' and 'illegal'...and that is where the buck stops. There are a LOT of things that are 'UNREASONABLE'...our existing government is one of them...that aside though, doing a mark up change alongside system changes to implement the VAT structure in and of itself is not illegal...not well thought out, maybe a bit unreasonable yes...but illegal...no.

John 9 years, 10 months ago

What John Rolle must consider is that VAT will being tying up the operating cash of many businesses and if it means that businesses have to take out loans or overdrafts to cover this additional cost on inventory (even though it is a pass thru item) then this will be a direct cost on the business. The accounting costs of many business will also increase as many businesses never have a formal accounting system. Then the method they are calculating the VAT at the ports amounts to more than 7.5%. First they calculate the duty, then the local charges including customs processing fees and levies and the duty is added to your cost of goods then the VAT is calculated on this sum. This can be between 9 and 12% depending on how much duty is paid and if you bring in a vehicle that attracts 80% customs duties, the local taxes will exceed the landed cost of the vehicle! the same is true for mattresses (200%) and cigarettes and other tobacco products..So yes there will be prices increases and eventually the market will find its equilibrium. Some businesses may also price themselves out of the market.

John 9 years, 10 months ago

If you pay 200% duty on mattresses for example plus a VAT on top of these duties plus local costs you will actually pay 26% VAT on the first cost of the beds. So how can businesses that sell beds account for this 25% direct increase in their inventory cost without raising prices? There is a carrying costs that can run 3-6 months in which the business will have these mattresses in inventory before they sell them.

Sign in to comment