0

Oil explorer: New fiscal regime does not apply to us

The Bahamas Petroleum Company’s (BPC) chief executive yesterday said the Government’s increased ‘take’ from oil exploration would not apply to its activities, because its fiscal terms were already set.

Simon Potter told Tribune Business that BPC’s licences, which were recently renewed for a further three years until April 18, contained terms dictating the Government’s share that pre-dated the Petroleum Bill and accompanying regulations coming to Parliament.

“The fiscal terms are contained in our licences already, so the fiscal regime discussed would be the extent that there are discussions with regard to licence issues in the future,” Mr Potter told Tribune Business.

“The fiscal terms [in the Bill] don’t impact the fiscal terms that were agreed with the Government in our licences.”

The fiscal regime contained in BPC’s licences tie the Government’s share to production volumes, with royalty rates ranging from a minimum 12.5 per cent to a maximum 25 per cent.

BPC has previously given presentations showing that, based on an $80 per oil barrel price, some 25 per cent of that sum will go to the Government with an equal share accruing to the company, provided that commercial quantities of recoverable oil can be found in Bahamian waters. The remaining 50 per cent, or $40 per barrel, would cover drilling and production costs.

BPC’s terms are thus much different from the enhanced fiscal regime unveiled in the House of Assembly on Wednesday by Kenred Dorsett, minister of the environment and housing.

While retaining the original ‘sliding scale’ for royalty payments that is contained in BPC’s licence, the new regime increases the Government’s take from a maximum 25 per cent to 75 per cent.

Mr Dorsett, in unveiling the revised Bill, said the fiscal regime determining the Government’s share of oil exploration revenues/profits had been amended to ensure its share increased as the latter rose.

Mr Dorsett said the Government would receive a minimum 12.5 per cent (same as under BPC’s licences), and up to a maximum 75 per cent, of any profits and give the Bahamas “a greater benefit should oil be found in commercially viable quantities and produced” in this nation.

Mr Dorsett said the Commonwealth Secretariat’s economic and legal section (ELS) had suggested that the previous regime, which capped the Government’s earnings at a maximum 25 per cent, gave the Bahamas “a relatively low level” of earnings from oil exploration.

The ELS recommended that a Resource Rent Tax (RRT) be included “to capture economic rent in cases of high profitability of a petroleum project”.

And it also suggested a ‘ceiling’ be imposed on the deductions an oil explorer could apply in calculating cost recovery and profitability.

The ELS said the Government should “set an annual cost recovery limit at 75 per cent of post-royalty production for oil, and 100 per cent for natural gas”.

Mr Dorsett thus concluded: “This regime is a great balance, ensuring that both the Government and the investor receives a fair share of the revenues generated from the petroleum industry of the Bahamas.”

In effect, this means that the Government’s share will increase should any oil explorers come after BPC, and is a recognition that the terms previously agreed with the latter cap its ‘maximum’ at too low a level.

Meanwhile, Mr Potter said BPC had “waited patiently” for the Government to introduce its new oil exploration regulatory regime, adding that the company “always respected its wishes” to upgrade this framework.

The BPC chief said the enhanced regulatory regime was introducing “the things that we would have done”, in terms of international standards and global best practices.

“It’s that clarity,” Mr Potter said of the regulatory regime’s publication and imminent passage through Parliament. “It says: ‘We are going to do this, and now we’ve done it’.

“That is what international investors want. They need clarity, and this is what clarifies the Government’s position with respect to hydrocarbon exploration.”

That refers to BPC’s continued search for a joint venture partner to share in the $60-$100 million burden of drilling its first exploratory well by April 2017, a task that should be made easier once the new regulatory regime is confirmed.

Mr Potter said the Government’s National Energy Policy (NEP) “said oil exploration has a role to play”, while the move to establish a Sovereign Wealth Fund was recognition that BPC’s efforts could bring tremendous financial rewards to the Bahamas if successful.

“Oil exploration, if successful, has the potential to be a game changer for the economy,” Mr Potter told Tribune Business. “I’m pretty sure we’ll find oil. It’s the volumes of oil we find that’s critical, and the extent to which they’re commercially developable.”

Comments

ThisIsOurs 9 years, 7 months ago

I wonder who their fancy Bahamian lawyer could be...hmmm

BahamaPundit 9 years, 7 months ago

Anyway, y'all still gats ta pay VAT on all dat oil.

ThisIsOurs 9 years, 7 months ago

Interesting point, they're jumping over each other trying to quash the illegal gaming conviction pre gaming laws...if they can go back with that why not with this?

killemwitdakno 9 years, 7 months ago

Christie and Davis on their off term for consultation. Perhaps in shares as well.

SaltyConchy 9 years, 7 months ago

PMSL, No surprise at all. May as well try to renegotiate the Aragonite deal as well. Incompetence reigns supreme in these islands! How about no drilling, PERIOD!

laallee 9 years, 7 months ago

if the Bahamian government want to attract foreign investment they must stick to contracts. they have to be competitive and trustworthy, getting a company to invest billions of dollars will not happen unless the company sees a profit. that's simple business not politics,,,,

http://tribune242.com/users/photos/2015…

duppyVAT 9 years, 7 months ago

When will BPC start extracting oil???????????? ............. they have been drilling for FIVE years ................... how long does it take to find oil??????? By the time they get around to it, Cuba may have sucked all out through their snake wells

magpie 9 years, 7 months ago

BPC have not been allowed to drill by the Govt. They have spent $100m of seismic surveys but no drilling. They now need to attract a big partner with very deep pockets to pay $60m to drill the first well. If they don't find enough oil to extract they lose the lot. It's high risk which is why our govt don't risk our money on a 1 in 5 chance of striking lucky.

duppyVAT 9 years, 7 months ago

Soooooooo, we dont get none of all this money you quoting ....... we just get some license money (and of course PGC/Brave lawyers fees) until they find oil ................... 50 years of pipe dreams

Sign in to comment