0

Death penalty only for a massacre

Among those attending the start of the legal year ceremony yesterday were Senior Justice Stephen Isaacs, left, and Justice Vera Watkins, second left.

Among those attending the start of the legal year ceremony yesterday were Senior Justice Stephen Isaacs, left, and Justice Vera Watkins, second left.

By LAMECH JOHNSON

Tribune Staff Reporter

ljohnson@tribunemedia.net

CHIEF Justice Sir Hartman Longley yesterday said it would take a massacre similar to the Charlie Hebdo attack in Paris for the death penalty to be imposed in The Bahamas.

Speaking a few weeks after the country hit a new murder record – with 149 homicides in 2015 – Sir Hartman told judicial officers during the 2016 Legal Year Opening Ceremony held in the Supreme Court that “the death penalty is virtually dead”.

“I share the view expressed by the president of the Court of Appeal,” Sir Hartman said. “Lest we have the experience of Charlie Hebdo, the chances of ever imposing the death penalty under the present system are nil.”

A year ago, 12 people were killed after gunmen burst into a magazine office in Paris, France. At least two gunmen attacked the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo and shocked witnesses spoke of sustained gunfire at the office as the attackers opened fire with Kalashnikov assault rifles.

Two brothers suspected of the magazine shootings were killed in an assault at a warehouse where they had held a hostage north of Paris.

“The reality is, and I imagine it is, that a constitutional amendment is necessary,” Sir Hartman said to judicial officers attending the ceremony.

The last person executed in the Bahamas was David Mitchell in January 2000.

He was convicted of stabbing two German tourists to death.

Mitchell’s execution was controversial because it was carried out while he had an appeal pending before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.

International criticism of the move was followed by a moratorium on capital punishment, which lasted until the Privy Council’s 2006 decision in the case of Maxo Tido.

In 2011, after a ruling from the London-based Privy Council, the Ingraham administration amended the death penalty law to specify the “worst of the worst” murders that would warrant execution.

Under the amended law, a person who kills a police or defence force officer, member of the Departments of Customs or Immigration, judiciary or prison services would be eligible for a death sentence. A person would also be eligible for death once convicted of murdering someone during a rape, robbery, kidnapping or act of terrorism.

Three years ago, a Constitutional Reform Commission was appointed by the Christie administration to conduct a comprehensive review of the Constitution and recommend a number of changes to it including the retention and enforcement of capital punishment.

In November 2014 the Court of Appeal overturned Anthony Clarke Sr’s death sentence for a paid execution and returned the matter to the Supreme Court for re-sentencing.

The judges did so after coming to a general consensus that “hanging is over” because of the vague threshold set by the Privy Council in past rulings like Maxo Tido, whose death sentence for the brutal murder of a 16-year-old girl was ultimately overturned because the London court found the murder was not “the worst of the worst.”

Comments

TruePeople 8 years, 10 months ago

? really ? that's stupid. Either you have and use the death penalty, or you remove it from law. Why all the pussyfooting? With many countries out-lawing the death penalty why is it so hard for the law "makers" here to update our countries judicial system in a similar way....? I'm sure the UN would support it......

OR, actually use the death penalty, as many Bahamians believe that this is an appropriate punishment for the heinous crimes committed here, and also a deterrent to young people considering crime.

No instead, these guys just sit back and keep blowing hot air all over the place with their non-sense talk, death penalty is still law, and no one is being hung.... incompetent

any why bring up Paris? because of the Privy councils 'worst of the worst' criteria?! what the hell is that? Further, why we still locked down by the privy council? guess we're not really independent...

What about the Fox hill Massacre? would that not qualify???? does you have to drop 12 people one time to get the death penalty?! if you drop 11 you don't qualify for it?!?!?! Stupidness.... no wonder the police take care of Eggy in jail... the justice system dem some real wastemans

asiseeit 8 years, 10 months ago

I wonder what this useless man would say if one of his family where to be butchered on the streets? These people are so out of touch it is crazy to have them at all. I am getting to the point where I ask myself why we even have a court system or for that matter a government as they most certainly do not work for or benefit the Bahamas in any way, shape or form. In fact I am convinced that the supposed leaders of this country ARE EXACTLY WHAT IS WRONG WITH OUR COUNTRY! We have been led astray by the scum that has risen to the top, maybe it is time to get rid of that very same SCUM!

jackbnimble 8 years, 10 months ago

In defense of the CJ, he is right. Judges are not limited to only looking at cases in the Bahamas but at worldwide trends in law outside of this jurisdiction that are persuasive. We signed on the Privy Council as our final court so until WE change that, ain't nothing happening.

The courts can only enforce laws that are passed by parliament so trust me, its not the court, it's the darned lawmakers, One simple referendum to amend the constitution is all that is needed and I don't doubt for a second it would pass unanimously cuz Bahamians are so fed up. But, of course, the lawmakers just don't give a sh*t. I guess there are no kickbacks to get unless its stem cell or numbers so to hell in a hand basket with the country and citizens who want change be damned!

Sign in to comment