By NEIL HARTNELL
Tribune Business Editor
nhartnell@tribunemedia.net
Moody’s has proven that the Government’s 2016-2017 deficit was “never $500 million”, a well-known businessman yesterday arguing: “Let’s not keep beating that narrative.”
Sir Franklyn Wilson, the Sunshine Holdings chairman, told Tribune Business that the ratings agency had shown the Minnis administration had violated “a key principle of accounting” in arriving at that estimate.
An accountant by profession himself, Sir Franklyn said consistency in accounting methods was the norm if financial statements and other figures were to be properly compared.
He argued, after being shown Moody’s August 25 ‘credit opinion’ on the Bahamas, that the Government had been less than transparent when it “changed overnight” to accrual-based accounting for the 2016-2017 fiscal year.
“I believe this Moody’s report demonstrates so clearly how this country would benefit if we could get past partisan politics,” Sir Franklyn told Tribune Business. “If we can get past partisan political stuff, and focus on truth in this country, we agree on so much.
“In this report, for example, it clearly establishes that based on a consistent accounting, with consistent accounting principles, the deficit was not $500 million. Based on consistent accounting principles, it was not.”
The FOCOL and Arawak Homes chairman was speaking out after Moody’s ‘credit opinion’ revealed that the Minnis administration adopted accrual-based accounting methods in respect of the 2016-2017 fiscal year, which elevated the Budget deficit to $500 million (see lead article on Page 1B).
This represented a switch away from the Government’s traditional cash-based accounting system, and had the effect of ensuring that the former Christie administration’s multi-million dollar pre-election spending commitments were captured when they were made - in 2016-2017.
Many observers will argue that Minnis administration was correct in accounting for these liabilities when they were incurred, and that the Government should have switched to accrual-based accounting full-time decades ago to properly manage the Bahamas’ fiscal affairs.
However, Sir Franklyn countered that the Government could not arbitrarily change its accounting methods to suit its agenda, arguing that this was against best accounting principles.
“Let’s not keep beating that narrative about $500 million,” he told Tribune Business. “What Moody’s underscores is the deficit was not $500 million using a consistent basis of accounting.
“That [accrual-based accounting] ain’t the way the system works. That ain’t right. Cash-based accounting is the way it’s always been done. A principle in accounting is consistency. If you’re going to be consistent, you have to do it on the same basis.
“The only way to get to $500 million is to change the basis of accounting. If you do that, you have to do it with a much higher degree of consistency other than for Government to decide to change it overnight. You’ve got to be highly transparent about it, and that didn’t happen.”
K P Turnquest, deputy prime minister and minister of finance, argued that the Government’s decision to account for the Christie administration’s spending commitments when they were made had been vindicated by Moody’s decision not to downgrade the Bahamas’ sovereign credit rating to so-called ‘junk’ status.
He said the Bahamas had been given credit by Moody’s for its transparency in divulging its true fiscal reality, but Sir Franklyn suggested that the “highly partisan political speech” he gave in late May when unveiling the Budget had sparked the rating agency’s review and threatened downgrade.
“Our cupboard is not bare, and their report points to the fact the cupboard is not bare,” Sir Franklyn told Tribune Business. “Let’s stop talking down the economy. The cupboard is not bare.”
Comments
Well_mudda_take_sic 7 years, 3 months ago
The slimy Snake is totally wrong and now every qualified professional accountant in the Bahamas knows just how much of a deceitful fool and liar he really is. No business (and no country) is required to continue using out dated accounting principles that produce misleading financial statements simply for the sake of consistency and this is true even if the prior year's financial statements cannot be restated using the new more up to date and meaningful accounting principles. Yes indeed, Snake is a class act all unto himself forever espousing nothing but foolish deceitfulness. What a charlatan this crooked SOB he is!
Reality_Check 7 years, 3 months ago
The greedy and dishonest Snake doesn't even use the cash basis of accounting for his own companies because it produces such meaningless and misleading financial information......yet he expects our new FNM government to do so. The corrupt Christie-led PLP government failed to adopt the accrual basis of accounting years ago, mainly because it allowed them to play foot loose and fancy free with our national financial statements while they (the crooked politicians) were stealing millions of dollars from us in just about every government agency, department and corporation. The slimy Snake knows all about this. Yep, what a corrupt arse hole the greedy Snake is.
John 7 years, 3 months ago
PLP's early convention: Many PLP's have built their lives on the premise that their party will be the government. That way they hog up opportunities including government jobs, government scholarships, government contracts, low cost housing and everything they can get their crab (crabby) claws on. This is done at the expense of the rest of the Bahamians society. Obviously the recent loss (severe 'cut a$$') of the PLP is not sitting well with the (PLP) party or its claw grabbing supporters. They especially don't like how the Minnis Administration is clamping down on everything in an effort to save the country and make life better for everyone. The 'all for me baby' people are vex. They want to topple the Minnis administration. Their early convention is evidence of this. For many of them five years is too long to do without government slackness. To the true patriots of the Bahamas they need to be kept out for at least 10 years. Don't just save the bays... Save the Bahamas!
Reality_Check 7 years, 3 months ago
10 years!!! Are you for real!!!!!! You can only mean "forevermore", unless you yourself are a die-hard PLP at your very core!!!!!!!
JohnDoe 7 years, 3 months ago
Sir Franklyn you are a bit rusty on your accounting knowledge and dead wrong. When there is a change of accounting principle the direct impact of the change is rightly included in the year of change therefore the true deficit is actually greater than $500 million. The prior year should then be adjusted retrospectively. What that means is that the current years deficit is actually greater than $500 million and the prior year should be adjusted upward as well for consistency, however, I suspect that adjustment would not be material because as has been the case for successive governments most unnecessary spending is telescoped for the year of the election.
Reality_Check 7 years, 3 months ago
And there is not even a need to restate the prior year by applying the new accounting principal retrospectively if it is impracticable to do so. Snake is an old hack accountant.....certainly not a professional one.
Sign in to comment
OpenID