By NEIL HARTNELL
Tribune Business Editor
nhartnell@tribunemedia.net
The Government “over-emphasised” the fact that Baha Mar’s Bahamian creditors were made whole, the Chamber of Commerce’s chairman said yesterday, reiterating that all countries “look after their own”.
Gowon Bowe acknowledged that the $4.2 billion development’s expatriate staff would “not have a good taste in their mouths” over their failure to receive due compensation, but said the Government had little to no influence over this.
He pointed out that it was the China Export-Import Bank’s decision on which creditors to pay, and how much, given that it had no obligation to make available $101 million to pay liabilities that were Baha Mar’s - not its own.
Mr Bowe said that with Baha Mar’s sale dependent on its construction completion, the China Export-Import Bank was bound to prioritise payments to those contractors and vendors who it needed to finish the project.
He added that the Christie administration’s mistake was to both place the focus on Bahamian creditors being ‘made whole’, thus highlighting the potentially ‘discriminatory’ treatment of certain creditors, and to give the impression that it was a party to the Baha Mar transaction.
“I believe that we unfortunately over-focused on the local payouts as opposed to looking at a receivership and liquidation in terms of how all parties will be dealt with,” Mr Bowe told Tribune Business.
“I think, for political reasons, there was unfortunately an over-emphasis that all Bahamian staff and creditors were being made whole. The focus became look at what we’ve done for Bahamian workers as opposed to look at what we’ve done to stimulate economic activity.”
Mr Bowe added that when the Baha Mar dispute erupted in early 2015, the Christie administration had a responsibility to ensure that whatever resolution was decided would benefit the Bahamian economy.
He said that “the message should have been driven” home that the Government, in return for granting $1.2 billion in tax incentives, wanted to spur economic activity, but the impression persisted that it was a “more active participant” in Baha Mar’s commercial transactions.
Mr Bowe was speaking after the Supreme Court ruled last week that Baha Mar’s former expatriate employees are not preferential creditors who rank ahead of the China Export-Import Bank. This means they cannot claim against a $3 million reserve that was set aside if the court ruled differently, and are now at the Chinese bank’s mercy as to whether they will receive compensation.
This has sparked complaints from the former employees about a creditor payout process that discriminated against them, and favoured Bahamians, with some warning that this could undermine the Bahamas’ reputation as a safe destination for foreign investors and employees.
“To be very candid, any country looks after itself,” Mr Bowe told Tribune Business. “I see the off-the-cuff comments about how it will impact foreign direct investment and expatriate labour, but what people are missing is that all employees were subject to the same process as foreign workers. The financier [China Export-Import Bank] made a choice as to who to pay out.”
Mr Bowe added that the impact on the 200 former expatriate staff was less than many assumed because most had only been with Baha Mar a short time, and he argued that given their managerial positions and skills, they would likely have secured new employment fairly quickly.
The Chamber chairman, whose tenure ends tomorrow, also said the expatriate staff would have been aware of the risk they were taking in joining a start-up venture. “I know as a senior executive that when I play in the US and UK there is a risk of companies going bankrupt and not paying me,” he told Tribune Business.
Comments
birdiestrachan 7 years, 4 months ago
It was the right thing to do pay the Bahamians first.
OMG 7 years, 4 months ago
This shows why the Bahamas is due to flounder in this modern world when you obviously don't understand the bigger picture. If a Bahamian teacher goes to America or Germany or the UK they are employed under the same terms as a native. In the Bahamas no- an expatriate/permanent resident can work his entire life here doing the same as his Bahamian colleagues but upon retirement is not entitled to a teachers pension. This is discrimination and it seems that it is rife in this country. Never mind Birdie you carry on thinking that these things are right and see how it backfires in the long run.
Porcupine 7 years, 4 months ago
Perhaps in the next few years we will see the results of this mentality. Me, me, me, me. The risk is clear. Doing business in The Bahamas is like few other places in the world. That is not a compliment.
The_Oracle 7 years, 4 months ago
Another apologist for Shady people in Sunny Places. The choice to pay Bahamians first was a hobbled political dictate. Negotiated from a self serving but weak position.
ohdrap4 7 years, 4 months ago
people should read this article before they start nominating this fella for mionster of finance lol.
banker 7 years, 4 months ago
If it were the Chinese making the decisions, why was James Smith involved. Another poster pointed out that perhaps the Chinese lent the PLP the money to pay the Bahamians. This sounds like a distinct possibility.
I would bet my bottom Chinese dollar that it wasn't their decision not to pay the foreigners.
Sign in to comment
OpenID