THE release earlier this week of a new landmark report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) makes grim and gloomy reading. This United Nations body has now declared time is running out to avert disaster precipitated by climate change unless drastic action is taken to phase out fossil fuels and reduce carbon emissions.
The IPCC calculates that, given the recent rate of increase of global warming, there are only a dozen years left for such warming to be kept to a maximum of 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-Industrial Revolution levels; and, if this is exceeded, the result will be a world plunged into extreme heat, droughts, floods, rising sea levels and widespread poverty.
Despite the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change which has been ratified by most nations - though the US has withdrawn - some people remain sceptical about the scientific evidence on which the judgments about climate change are based. But this time the IPCC has declared unequivocally that it has high confidence in its predictions.
Since its conclusions have been reached by people claimed to be the world’s leading climate scientists, it is hard for the layman not to take this latest IPCC warning seriously. Observers are not in a position to question the detailed figures used. But most people are aware some sort of change in climatic conditions is happening constantly and it can be reasonably inferred that excessive carbon emissions being pumped into the atmosphere are more likely than not to be having some sort of damaging effect.
So it is now generally accepted climate change is real and poses a threat. Many Bahamians are aware our country – classified as a Small Island Developing State - is particularly vulnerable to its effects because of the likely, if not inevitable, rise in sea levels from global warming and the likely damaging effects on coral reefs as well as flooding of coastal areas where people live.
The islands of our archipelago are for the most part low-lying and, even if the rise in temperatures is limited to the earlier international target of less than 2 degrees Celsius, this could be disastrous for The Bahamas because so much of our landmass is already threatened by higher sea levels and flooding. Such effects could be worse than those in the aftermath of hurricanes and would not only damage the living conditions of thousands of Bahamians and the natural resource of our coral reefs but would also seriously hamper our major industry of tourism.
The scientific advice is that to control continuing temperature rises it is essential to reduce global carbon emissions. A small country like ours is a “low emitter” of CO2 and we have an interest in making the developed nations accountable through the Paris Agreement for taking action to reduce their much heavier emissions.
We should surely coordinate such efforts with other CARICOM countries in a similar position to ours. But we also need to improve our energy efficiency and to expand alternative energy sources in cooperation with others in world organisations like the International Renewable Energy Agency which is focused on increasing the use of such energy.
Meanwhile, the Government will no doubt continue to advance its “national energy policy”. Clearly, in a country like The Bahamas with its abundant sunshine and offshore winds we should do all we can to develop our local renewable energy potential.
At the same time, we should promote the conservation of our natural resources while encouraging individual environmental responsibility including the Youth Environmental Corps. Removal of tariffs on solar systems and panels has already happened and we hope that comparable measures in relation to other sources of energy are also being considered. Perhaps a formal programme for the development and utilisation of renewable energy, with imaginative input from the general public, could be considered.
Many people will have taken note of the press statement in November, 2016 by the Minister of the Environment and Housing in the then PLP government in which he committed The Bahamas to taking action on climate change following our ratification of the Paris Agreement.
In light of the latest IPCC report, we hope today’s FNM government will be reviewing the progress of such action and, in particular, how the nation is meeting its international obligations.
An official public statement about such an important issue would be widely welcomed -- and we hope there is a good story to tell that people will find reassuring.
Comments
Porcupine 6 years, 2 months ago
So, what is the editorial position on Oban and drilling for oil off of Andros? You seem to understand what the IPCC report was about; carbon emissions. Now, what of that strong editorial position in support of our joining with those who are actually thinking these things through in a responsible and moral manner. Unfortunately, the realities are looking pretty bleak for the vast majority of the landmass of The Bahamas. I am looking elsewhere for my 4 year old son's future.
realitycheck242 6 years, 2 months ago
Scientists have identified 15 technologies — from wind, solar, hydro and nuclear energy to conservation techniques — that are ripe for large-scale use and showed that each could solve a significant portion of the problem. Their analysis, indicates that many combinations of these 15 technologies could prevent global emissions of greenhouse gasses from rising for the next five decades. All it takes is for the IPCC to be given teeth with enforcement of new climate change legislation.for all countries, especially the two biggest causes of climate change in the world the USA and China.. Sadly with world leaders like Trump in the white house,bowing to special fossell fuel interest the inevitable rollback is being postponed.
Porcupine 6 years, 2 months ago
And, with a PM like Minnis we continue down the oil drilling off Andros, Oban refinery and fossil fuel highway. And, a population who has little to no intellectual spark. We don't need the IPCC to be given teeth. We need to understand that there are more books to learn from than just the bible. That one has evidently failed us. Let's try another.
The_Oracle 6 years, 2 months ago
Our Government and their on again off again/ reworking it again energy policy which, if we even have one at this point is guaranteed already obsolete. They are so far beyond the 8 ball it cannot be seen. Technology has already moved in advance of first world utility lobbying/push back efforts, already negating whatever contrived barriers to energy independence Government/BPL/BEC can dream up. Dinosaurs became oil and gas, BPL/BEC cannot avoid the same. I look forward to contributing to it.
Sign in to comment
OpenID