By KHRISNA RUSSELL
Deputy Chief Reporter
krussell@tribunemedia.net
HOUSE Speaker Halson Moultrie accused media in the country of “descending” to a certain level, adding it was an issue that needed addressing.
He did not clearly explain what he meant, but told House of Assembly members that “fake” and opinionated stories had been published online and in local newspapers.
Earlier, he openly rebuked a Nassau Guardian reporter seated in the House gallery for taking photos of member of Parliament Chester Cooper, who was contributing to debate on a bill to exempt fees for replacement documents lost during Hurricane Dorian.
Speaker Moultrie then ordered the reporter’s cellphone be turned over to a House clerk and the images deleted. “In the gallery, the reporter - it is against the rules of this House and that has been explained when we had the disturbance in this House - for any reporter to use their cellphone in this chamber and to take photographs or videos in this chamber without the approval of the chair,” Speaker Moultrie said, interrupting Mr Cooper’s contribution.
“And so on this occasion I request that you turn your phone over the clerk and to have that portion of the video that you just recorded deleted from your cell phone.
“In future, seek the permission of the chair before you are permitted and allowed to take any video footage of the chamber.”
The reporter had not taken video, but still photos of Mr Cooper, The Tribune was told. The newspaper’s photographer was not in the chamber at the time, Nassau Guardian Executive Editor Candia Dames posted on Facebook yesterday, explaining why the reporter was taking photos of the MP.
“Our photographer, who was not in Parliament at the time, has confirmed that she has never been given any specific permission to take all the hundreds of photos she took in Parliament previously,” Ms Dames wrote.
The speaker’s decision drew criticism from member of Parliament for Mangrove Cay and South Andros Picewell Forbes who argued that free press in the country should have the liberty of gathering photos and video with cellphones.
However, the speaker insisted that permission had to be sought in such instances, adding that even the Hansard was limited with respect to footage according to House rules.
When he spoke to the same issue again during the sitting, Speaker Moultrie said the rules regarding cellphone use had been in place since 2005.
“There were a number of complaints by members that persons were coming into the Parliament taking photographs and so forth of members in embarrassing positions. The rules were also put in place to prevent the cameras from focusing on the documents that our members may have laid on their table because there were complaints in that regard as well where the cameras were focusing down on the desk on members’ documents.
“So these rules were put in place to maintain a certain decorum in the house and to protect the information.”
He continued: “I can imagine the press demonising the speaker as a person who is trying to prevent freedom of speech and freedom of expression and so forth, but I am of the view and I’ll say this for the record that the media, despite all the change in technology, has descended to a level in this country that needs to be addressed.
“They are competing with social media and as a consequence a number of false reports, fake reports and opinionated stories are appearing in the newspapers and I (have) even seen on social media videos of members of Parliament that have been taken completely out of context and other information presented on social media. It’s being done.
“It cannot be denied, and so we have to maintain a certain level in this chamber to protect the institution itself from that sort of infringement by unscrupulous persons because in every sector of society you will have those type of individuals and the media is not exempted from that.
“That has been my experience these two and half years,” Speaker Moultrie said.
In May, after videos of a surprising outburst in Parliament went viral on social media, Speaker Moultrie ruled that visitors were prohibited from carrying cellphones into the gallery.
At the time, he said the rule did not apply to members of Parliament, technocrats and the media. However, he said the media will have to seek permission from the House through Chief Clerk David Forbes to capture cellphone video.
In May, Fontella Chipman-Rolle, sister of Centreville MP Reece Chipman, stood in the gallery and threw several white wrist bands onto the floor of the House of Assembly.
She wore a shirt that said “Chipman strong”.
“Change the system,” she shouted as police pulled her out of the chamber. “Our land will be returned to us, not by you but by the God we serve.”
Comments
sheeprunner12 5 years ago
Yes, Mr. Speaker .............. cellphones have rendered Man's judgement almost incoherent and uncontrollable.
Cellphones should be BANNED from the precincts (second storey) of the House of Assembly (except for the MPs). Scanners should be used on the ground level to access the HOA.
Let the media do their job as they have done since 1844 ........ observe, listen and interpret.
We cannot condone this LOW level of "street journalism" ........ aka fake news
The_Oracle 5 years ago
But cellphones have also shown us those asleep, those eating, chatting, joking and not paying attention to the business they conduct on our behalf. Perhaps the maintenance of house decorum is maintained or degraded by those who sit..... Media has not degraded our society, it has merely opened the window on the degradations of men.
Sickened 5 years ago
Very good point.
sheeprunner12 5 years ago
What the MPs do in their private spaces while not engaged in the debate should not be a concern of the media ........ that is the reason for the Parliamentary Channel. No need to make our leaders any more public spectacles than many of them have already done to/for themselves.
That is my point about not allowing indiscriminate use of cellphones in the HOA Chamber by visitors and the press. ORDER.
Dawes 5 years ago
The happenings of parliament are on TV if anyone is bored enough to watch those supposed honored men and woman talk the same idiotic items they talk about each time (normally well the other side did it so therefore so can we). Maybe they should ban that, even better just ban the parliament and save the people the money, as all the parliament does is rubber stamp, they are of no use really.
proudloudandfnm 5 years ago
Time to get a new speaker, this dude is insane. Or ignorant. Or both. Either way he gots to go....
ThisIsOurs 5 years ago
"There were a number of complaints by members that persons were coming into the Parliament taking photographs and so forth of members in embarrassing positions"
I see what he mean, look at his photo accompanying the arrive :-
TalRussell 5 years ago
During so many sessions the Comrade House Speaker Halson has become a restless shit disturber's magnet for striving brungs controversy up into chamber Populaces Honourable House, yes, no .... first the Speaker went after a select list MP's, now it's the Reporters.... then he will summon members social media populaces to appear before his colonial power trip's chair .... You just couldn't make this wacky nonsense up ....
mandela 5 years ago
Mr. Speaker, you are coming off as a dictator
Socrates 5 years ago
Everybody wants to be a disciple of Trump.. anything that you disagree with is now 'fake' ..
Sign in to comment
OpenID