0

'Polluters must pay with fines that hurt'

The MS Maasdam

The MS Maasdam

By Syann Thompson

sthompson@tribunemedia.net

THE Bahamas should send a strong message to environmental crime offenders that the country’s natural resources and laws will be respected, according to one stakeholder.

While applauding Attorney General Carl Bethel for the government’s position on Carnival Cruise Line’s recent dumping in Bahamian waters, Eric Carey told The Tribune those who break environmental laws and are persistent at it should pay the penalty.

“I commend the AG for his stance and for the government’s stance because we certainly think that this is the time for government to send a message that polluting of our waters will not be tolerated, and we need to re-enforce and re-emphasise that,” said Mr Carey, executive director of Bahamas National Trust.

“The government has brought forward new legislation to deal with this matter and we encourage the Attorney General to send a clear message that the laws and the environment of The Bahamas will be respected.”

Tribune Business reported that a monitor appointed by a South Florida federal court revealed Carnival Cruise Line committed further environmental infractions last year – some of which occurred while vessels were in port in Nassau and Freeport. The monitor’s latest report, filed on New Year’s Eve, detailed incidents including the March 6, 2019 discharge of 34 cubic metres of black water/sewage in Bahamian waters from the MS Maasdam as it sailed from Half Moon Cay, the private island, to Fort Lauderdale.

Also cited was a September 9, 2019 incident involving the Carnival Sunrise when “a considerable amount of rust” was discharged into Nassau harbour after a technician started up an “infrequently used water pump” while the vessel was docked at Prince George Wharf.

The recently passed Environmental Planning and Protection Act entails a series of fines and penalties allowing them to be directly proportional to the environmental infraction. This law allows fines from $500 to $30 million and or imprisonment not exceeding ten years.

Mr Carey explained that large companies who commit major environmental crimes should receive fines that are commensurate with the infraction.

“I would say that (the fines) need to be on the scale of millions rather than thousands or tens of thousands,” he said.

“For any company that is a multi-million-dollar company, then the penalty should fit not only the crime, but how serious it is, but it should also be a significant deterrent.

“Charging a major corporation $500 will not be a deterrent but charging them $10 million might indeed be a deterrent. The fine needs to be fixed at a level that government is confident will act as a deterrent to Carnival. Even if it is not a deterrent, the amount must be significant that if we have to do clean up or mitigation, that the government has the wherewith all to do that, and then of course to fund the necessary monitoring which obviously must take place.”

He added Bahamian officials need to better monitor vessels in this territory as ocean polluting can cause havoc on the marine environment.

“The introduction of any foreign entity, whether its pollutants like sewerage or fossil fuels or oil spills or plastics, upsets the balance of the ocean and it can directly kill marine animals that may ingest this raw sewerage.

“It certainly degrades the quality of water, if it gets into areas that could potentially impact coral reefs then the degraded quality of the water could have a negative impact. Coral reefs are prevalent and healthy in The Bahamas is because we have relatively clean and crystal-clear waters, interfering with that upsetting the balance with things like coral reefs is very negative for our waters. Human health and welfare also a concern, if the dumping is relatively close to an area where humans can then be impacted either—swimming in it or it washing onto beaches—then it’s definitely potentially for human contact with raw sewerage or byproduct or break down of it,” said Mr Carey.

“The protection of our environment is not only important to tourism but also to our very way of life. The environment is what feeds us, and it provides tourism opportunities, it’s what we depend on for our very existence.”

Comments

Well_mudda_take_sic 4 years, 9 months ago

Repost:

Carnival literally saves millions and millions of dollars of costs each and every year, costs that it would otherwise incur if its cruise ships did not very deliberately dump their shiit and contaminants in and about our territorial seas. Carnival will happily pay the Bahamas fines up to $30 million every few years for the privilege of continuing their illegal dumpings because it is economically advantageous (more profitable) for them to do so. The maximum fine of $30 million under The Environmental Planning and Protection Act 2019 should have been much higher; at least $75 million for each and every separate incident.

We're all soon going to be swimming in Carnival's dumped shiit and contaminants no matter where we go swimming in our waters....and savouring its deliciousness in our favourite locally caught seafood dishes!

proudloudandfnm 4 years, 9 months ago

Actually they are not saving millions and millions. Evacuating waste water and sludge is not expensive at all, and the final product is sold by the plant that processes it. Sludge becomes bunker fuel and waste water is sold as potable water for systems...

So this is just Carnival being cheap a-holes...

Well_mudda_take_sic 4 years, 9 months ago

Suggest you read the very onerous EPA and other U.S. regulations that apply to the proper discharging and disposal of waste products and contaminants from cruise ships while they are docked at U.S. ports.

ThisIsOurs 4 years, 9 months ago

"commend the AG for his stance"

The AG didn't relay any "stance". He simply said ~I'm so surprised to see this story in the paper.

What does that mean? Was he surprised the story got out? Did cabinet know about this continued dumping after the 40 million fine was levied in thd US and the judge called Carnival a recidivist dumping offender? Did they know even as they hastily signed that agreement after Dorian. I recall thinking where is this haste come from? Did they know about the incidents that Carl Bethel is now taking a "stance" on?

Sign in to comment