By TANYA SMITH-CARTWRIGHT
tsmith-cartwright@tribunemedia.net
WITH just under a year to the completion of his Cable Beach development, Paul Wynn is challenging the government to put one of its dilapidated buildings out to tender to remove the eyesore from the area of his investment.
Mr Wynn, developer of GoldWynn, a hotel and condominium development in Cable Beach just opposite the Office of the Prime Minister, recently learned his company’s offer to purchase “La Playa” has been turned down. “La Playa” is a dilapidated mansion situated beside Goodman’s Bay.
It was actually purchased by the National Insurance Board for $3.5 million on behalf of the Christie administration for a Prime Minister’s residence. “La Playa” sat in a state of disrepair for almost 15 years. Mr. Wynn’s offer on the house was some $2.25 million. This offer, he says, has been turned down.
“We put our offer in and we heard through a third party that they (the government) are not interested,” he told The Tribune yesterday.
“I challenge the government to send it to tender with the commitment that someone has to build something there within 24 months. Put it out to tender. The smartest businessman gets out with his first loss. The government made a bad deal. It’s just not worth it.”
“La Playa” is one of a few abandoned homes on the strip where GoldWynn is being built and Mr Wynn has expressed displeasure in the past about its deplorable state and the close proximity to his property. Even though his bid has been turned down, he still wants to purchase the house and clean up the property.
Also abandoned in that area are “Fairview”, a home that no one lives in, but is maintained properly; the Bahamas Development Bank and the Gaming Board building. “La Playa” is the worst of them all with overgrown foliage, giant, rotting gates and an abandoned building that vagrants now call home.
“I am asking the government to do this because I do not want next to our hotel development this rotting house,” he said. “I want the government to put the property out to tender and let the highest purchaser buy it, but they have to make the commitment to redevelop it. So no one buys it and just lets it sit there and rot. That happens a lot.
“So let them make a commitment by way of a letter of credit or something to say that they are going to fix the house and develop it. Give them a 24-month window to do it. Put it for tender but the condition is that you have to renovate the house or redevelop the property but you have to do it within 24 months.
“Personally I am petrified that someone is going to buy it and not develop it. I just want someone to do something with that house. It’s an eyesore. It’s at a prominent spot and I really want to see Cable Beach developed. Vagrants are sleeping there. No one watches it. When people think ‘La Playa’ is locked up I say, no it isn’t. Go to the wall, there’s a big hole in it that someone broke out. People can go in and out of that hole all the time.”
In the past, Mr Wynn has had potential buyers ask him about the eyesore buildings in the area. He has, however, seen sales at his own development pick up in recent weeks.
“I’m estimating my project will be complete around next April, May (2022). Our sales have been fantastic over the last six to seven weeks. That’s why I am looking to do a second development. I would still love to buy La Playa and not develop any mid-rise. I just want to clean it up and I don’t want to make any money from it.
“I will do something with that property and quick. Whatever I do, I am going to do it quick. Maybe a café or restaurants … something that the people going to Goodman’s Bay can use. I will not put a mid-rise or a high-rise there. I just need to clean up the area.”
Mr Wynn also promises to rejuvenate Goodman’s Bay if given the opportunity to purchase “La Playa”.
More like this story
- INSIGHT: Unravelling the knot of the government properties being left to rot
- INSIGHT: Why on Earth is this jewel being allowed to fall into ruin?
- INSIGHT: Is anyone listening – why are we letting millions slip through our fingers?
- INSIGHT: The PM’s party house - a white elephant or a lost opportunity?
- Bahamian developer in deal at Goodman’s Bay
Comments
bahamianson 3 years, 3 months ago
eye sore? listen, as a bahamian, I am tired of driving downtown . The entire downtown is an eye sore.we only do things for foreigners and not for the wellbeing of bahamians. do something with bay street, now! it is a shame and disgrace that our major road and its properties look like that. What a disgrace!
Lroberts 3 years, 3 months ago
Sadly it seems many Bahamians, including successive governments, are content with eyesores. All of the properties you mention are owned by Bahamians.
Sickened 3 years, 3 months ago
I suggest that Wynn financially support the PLP and with their victory he will get that property and can develop it as he sees fit. The FNM simply don't want to move forward quickly enough.
ThisIsOurs 3 years, 3 months ago
no. too often we've seen these foreign concernd acquire beach property then do everything they can to frustrate Bahamian beach access. the amount of beach access regular bahamians have on new providence is an damning indictment on govts of the past 50 years. every few days someone else putting up a fence to the "beach", cause no house could build there, with signs private property. disgraceful
enough 3 years, 3 months ago
This is ours, agreed. But will any government have the courage to do anything? I am not even clear on what the beach access rules are anymore, everyone is doing their own thing. You should ride out East.
ThisIsOurs 3 years, 3 months ago
I see all the Private Property signs. That high water mark law needs to be changed. its ridiculous to claim that is how you ensure Bahamians have access to every beach. Which Bahamian sits on the beach at the high water mark? It could only be exactly what it is, a legal means to deny beach access to the average black Bahamian.
Emilio26 3 years, 3 months ago
So are you suggesting that the government should those gated communities in New Providence like Lyford Cay, Old Fort Bay, Albany and even Palm Cay take down there walls to any straggler can just walk across their property?
ThisIsOurs 3 years, 3 months ago
Yes it would be nice but unfortunately I think those are probably irreversible. Its so sad. We have such beautiful beaches and the majority of the population cant enjoy them. Because the majority of the population is on new providence. I think its a crime.
But I was really speaking about the fences that line the coast line with 2 inches between the fence and the water. The only thing that can go on that land is the fence. Its a bold faced you're not allowed on this beach statement
I AM suggest that the high water mark stipulation needs to be abandoned. Its discriminatory. If the true intent is to make all beaches accessible, make all beaches accessible
mandela 3 years, 3 months ago
Dear Mr.Wynn if its a sore eye to you you can either uproot your building or close your eyes but don't dictate to the Bahamian people
Emilio26 3 years, 3 months ago
Mandela if the abadoned property is just sitting there rotting away and is also attracting vagrants it is bad for the residents that live on that strip. You probably live in am area where jonsers that's why you seem not to care.
TalRussell 3 years, 3 months ago
Is there a hint corruption story within lands, just waiting to be told about the how/why a once pro-capitalist Red party, always performs flipflop, exceptin' when one is from their shortlist most preferred. Some are just not good** at hidin'; stuff, yes?
bahamarich 3 years, 3 months ago
When the government bought this property it was newly renovated and in supurb condition. The government never shoulf have bought in the first place. Mr Wynn's proposal in no way would limit public access but greatly improve the asthetics of the area. He even comments on other help he would give Goodman's bay.
This property is an eysore, there are multiple vagrants living in it and the government doesn't even pick up any of the trash left by beachgoers. You go Paul, let's move forward.
Sign in to comment
OpenID