By EARYEL BOWLEG
Tribune Staff Reporter
ebowleg@tribunemedia.net
A DRAFT version of the Citizenship Act should be presented to the Cabinet by the summer, Attorney General Ryan Pinder said on Friday.
Successive governments have sought to address the disparities in men and women passing on Bahamian citizenship in two failed constitutional referendums.
Mr Pinder has previously said the Davis administration intends to address the issue through legislation instead of holding another referendum.
“As the former Prime Minister (Hubert) Ingraham had mentioned a few weeks ago this can also be done by legislative action and that's what we’re looking at. We have an initial draft of the Citizenship Act prepared,” Mr Pinder said yesterday. “We’re going through it, well I’m refining it and we hope to be able to present it before Cabinet in rather short order as one of our commitments on human rights matters…”
Asked for a timeline, he said: “It should definitely be presented before Cabinet (in) the summer. As you know, it all depends on when the summer recess is for Parliament whether it gets tabled during summer or not, maybe on break, but we definitely would hope to have that before Cabinet by the summer months.”
The former member of Parliament for Elizabeth also reiterated that there is a comprehensive review underway of laws pertaining to juveniles. Social Services Minister Obie Wilchcombe had previously said the Office of the Attorney General is looking at “inconsistencies” in law with the age of consent. The issue is expected to also be brought to Cabinet soon for consideration.
When asked about the age of consent matter, Mr Pinder said: “Well that specifically is a policy decision by the Cabinet. We have benchmarked that internationally. The decision will effectively come down to whether Cabinet is prepared to leave it at — to go to 16 or 18.
“Even more important than that in respect to the juveniles in the country is that there are a lot of different age limits and confusing age aspects within our laws that pertain to juveniles and a lot of that time that creates confusion. It creates a lack of transparency and understanding, both in prosecution of juveniles who commit crimes, but in other elements of just society and culture.
“In large, we’re not looking at just the age of consent. We’re looking at all of the aspects for juveniles and the age limits throughout all of our pieces of legislation to see if we can bring more transparency, equality, reliability, and dependability with respect to age limits of juveniles and the laws that we have in the country.
"So that's just one element, the age of consent of what we’re doing. We have a comprehensive review underway right now of all of the areas in the law that pertain to children and juveniles and we look to make a recommendation to Cabinet shortly on that. That review is pretty advanced and then once Cabinet gives us directions on that, we’ll be able to prepare the requisite amendments to be able to go before Parliament on that.”
The current age of consent for sex is 16.
Comments
KapunkleUp 2 years, 7 months ago
Changing the law of consent changes nothing. It's like changing the legal drinking age to 21. What is needed is the enforcement of existing laws.
sheeprunner12 2 years, 7 months ago
That new citizenship law will be challenged in court .... If it doesn't have the backing of the Constitution, how can politicians expect that it will stand up under scrutiny??
tribanon 2 years, 7 months ago
I heard someone say this juvenile puppet of Christie and Davis is actually going to be recommending the voting age, consent for sex age, driving age, consent to smoke potent cannabis age, and consent to sign contracts age, all be made consistent at the age 16. Just when you think these daft idiots can't possibly get any more stupider, they go ahead and prove you wrong.
As for the citizenship matters, that's entirely the business of the people under our Constitution and not the business of Ryan Pinder as the dutiful AG lapdog of the corrupt and incompetent Davis and Cooper led PLP administration. Only through a duly held national referendum can changes be made to our Constitution regarding who is entitled to be a Bahamian citizen, and that includes any and all material questions of interpretation as to original intent.
The exclusive right of the Bahamian people to determine for themselves who is eligible for Bahamian citizenship is the most sacred right we have as a people. The dutiful lapdog and his masters had best butt out of what falls exclusively within the domain of the Bahamian people and not our legislators.
Flowing 2 years, 7 months ago
Who created the constitution?
tribanon 2 years, 7 months ago
The Bahamian people and our colonial masters through a special body of individuals authorized for that very specific purpose with very deliberate protections built in to prevent subsequent changes being made to it by to it by our legislators without the consent of the people in a duly held national referendum.
Sign in to comment
OpenID