0

GB airport: Govt ‘rolled over and played dead’

photo

Carey Leonard

• Taxpayer ‘saddled’ with Hutchison/Port ‘loss maker’

• Yet former owners retaining ‘jewels in the crown’

• Ex-GBPA attorney: Harbour ‘missed opportunity’

By NEIL HARTNELL

Tribune Business Editor

nhartnell@tribunemedia.net

The government has “rolled over and played” dead by permitting Hutchison Whampoa to dump all its loss-making assets on the Bahamian taxpayer, a prominent attorney argued yesterday.

Carey Leonard, the former Grand Bahama Port Authority (GBPA) in-house counsel, told Tribune Business that the extent of Grand Bahama International Airport’s operating losses over the past two-and-a-half years was further evidence that the Hong Kong-based conglomerate had retained its “jewels in the crown” while offloading liabilities it no longer wished to retain.

Having sold the Grand Lucayan to the government for $65m in early September 2018, Hutchison Whampoa has now completed its second disposal by handing Freeport’s main aviation gateway over to the government via a deal structure that Mr Leonard described as “potentially fatal” to hopes of fulfilling the city’s potential as a transshipment, distribution and logistics hub.

He reiterated his previous argument that the government should have purchased Freeport Harbour Company, the airport’s parent, by compulsory acquisition if needed from 50/50 owners, Hutchison and the Grand Bahama Port Authority’s Port Group Ltd, along with the 741-acre Sea Air Business Centre (SABC).

Without these two assets, Mr Leonard suggested that Dionisio D’Aguilar, minister of tourism and aviation, will struggle to fulfill his ambitions for transforming Grand Bahama International Airport into an aviation cargo hub and profit centre that stands in stark contrast to the $13.3m worth of operating losses incurred from 2019 onwards.

Voicing surprise at the $200m price tag for the “comprehensive redevelopment” of Grand Bahama International Airport, and suggesting that this might include the required investment to develop a cargo hub, he told this newspaper: “I’m sure that includes the cargo centre and everything like that.

“Because the government has decided not to compulsorily acquire the harbour and the Sea Air Business Centre, you can forget that cargo thing. That’s the very reason I suggested the government buy Freeport Harbour Company. I wonder how much profit the Harbour Company had last year, even with the airport?”

Tribune Business revealed yesterday how, based on its audited and unaudited financial statements, Grand Bahama Airport Company suffered an operating loss (based on earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation and amortisation or EBITDA) of $5.567m during the 2019 calendar year.

Some $9.608m in revenues were dwarfed by $15.1276m in total operating expenses, of which $3.69m related to staff costs and $11.486m to non-labour expenses. Those figures likely resulted from the catastrophic damage that Hurricane Dorian inflicted on Grand Bahama International Airport, and its closure to income-generating commercial and private aviation traffic for several months.

And the COVID-19 pandemic, with the closure of international and domestic aviation traffic for a significant portion of last year, was probably the major contributing factor that plunged Grand Bahama Airport Company into a further $6.663m operating loss for 2020.

Total revenues, both aeronautical and non-aeronautical, dropped by almost two-thirds year-over-year to $3.046m, while total operating expenses were down by more than one-third at $9.708m. However, the ‘red ink’ continued to mount with a further $1.105m worth of operating losses during the first four months of 2021 to end-April.

As a result, Grand Bahama International Airport has collectively generated some $13.3m worth of operating losses in the near two-and-a-half years immediately prior to its acquisition by the Government, which closed on June 1. Further multi-million dollar taxpayer subsidies may well be required to ensure the facility remains a “going concern” until a private sector developer is found to take over all responsibilities.

Summing up the airport deal’s immediate consequences for Bahamian taxpayers, Mr Leonard blasted: “The Government has saddled the people with a loss-maker because they’re too scared to do anything with Hutchison. 

“The unfortunate thing is both governments continue to bow at the feet of Hutchison, and as long as they bow at the feet of Hutchison, the people of Grand Bahama suffer. When you buy a company, it’s the seller who’s responsible to pay off the staff, not the buyer. Everything you look at, they’ve literally rolled over and played dead....

“I’m very concerned that the people have been saddled with a loss maker that I feel was unnecessary had the Government done a compulsory acquisition of the harbour. We’ve taken on all the money losers from Hutchison and left it with the real money, the jewel in the crown,” he continued.

“They continue to get all the cream. DevCo (The Grand Bahama Development Company) pays no real property taxes. In days gone by we didn’t mind that as Devco and Hutchison were responsible for laying some money out, but now they pay no taxes and make the money. It’s very discouraging, and I don’t think you’re likely to see much happening in Grand Bahama.”

Hutchison’s key Grand Bahama assets are Freeport Container Port and the Freeport Harbour Company, while DevCo has frequently been accused of “land banking” with its 70,000-plus acre holdings. Mr Leonard’s reference to staff payments alludes to the fact that the Government contributed $1m, or 50 percent, of the severance and benefits payouts to airport staff during the ownership transition.

Acknowledging the Government’s strained fiscal position, he nevertheless said that if it had acquired the Harbour Company and Sea Air Business Centre it would have established the control over transportation costs and related taxation that was required for a vertically-integrated transshipment and cargo hub also featuring the airport.

Asserting that an opportunity has been “completely missed”, Mr Leonard added: “It could be fatal. It really is extremely damaging. You’ll wind up in negotiations with Hutchison and you will never, ever get going.” He also asserted that a $50m-$60m investment to rebuild Grand Bahama International Airport “makes more sense” than the new $200m price tag.

The Government, in defence of its position, will likely argue it had no choice but to take over the airport given that Hutchison and the GBPA had signalled early on they had no intention of investing the significant sums necessary to rebuild an aviation gateway that is vital to Freeport’s survival as a city and economy.

While the Government has sought to place much of the focus on the $1 purchase price, many observers believe that Hutchison and the GBPA have effectively been allowed to abandon their developmental obligations to Freeport under the Hawksbill Creek Agreement by offloading a loss-making asset on to taxpayers while retaining all the profitable ones.

And there have been suggestions that the airport’s Dorian insurance claim payout may have been as high as $25m, a sum that the former owners have been allowed to keep rather than invest in the rebuilding.

Comments

KapunkleUp 2 years, 10 months ago

Memo to government: STOP BUYING AND SELL WHAT YOU ALREADY HAVE.

1

tribanon 2 years, 10 months ago

And it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure what motivated Minnis, D'Aguilar and Dr. Scott to allow Hutchison Whampoa and GBPA to saddle the Bahamian taxpayers with their loss-making ventures.

I think we can safely assume that the foreign owners of Hutchison Whampoa and GBPA are not the only ones who have made out like big time bandits in the highly secretive deals behind the off-loading of their unprofitable operations on to the backs of Bahamian taxpayers.

0

Hoda 2 years, 10 months ago

What does it matter, you commenters were the one last year talking about it didn’t matter if the airport made money the govt should take it. The tax paper pays for most airports In This country just how y’all like it don’t they.

Let’s be real what multi national conglomerate is going to push millions into a loss making venture to make sure the community feels good. How many of your are pouring money into a loss making business. How about we make the place interesting and stop focusing so much on selling rum and get those flights up so the airport can be profitable. Or was it the former owners job to also build the tourist attractions and intrigue to make ppl want to fly in…

0

Kofi 2 years, 10 months ago

Says a disgruntled former employees masquerading as an objective analyst! We are buikding another port, or have we all forgotten? If Abaco can get 2 ports surely GBI. can too

0

Economist 2 years, 10 months ago

Have a read of the Hawksbill Creek Agreements. This was not the Governments responsibility but those companies.

Have a read.

http://laws.bahamas.gov.bs/cms/images...">http://laws.bahamas.gov.bs/cms/images...

1

Hoda 2 years, 10 months ago

It’s irrelevant at this point. Further wasn’t that part of the reason you advocated that the airport be seized. You took an asset that you knew was not profitable, the prior owner flat out said it’s not profitable, take it. Furthermore, that what you do when someone breaches the agreement or is in breach. The point is you knew, everyone knew the airport wasn’t profitable. …my point is do you think the lack of airlift and profit to an island 25 minutes away from Florida could have something to do with the lack of events, interest and attractions. You’ve taken the airport now address the problems since the devils are no longer in picture

0

tribanon 2 years, 10 months ago

You're clearly a lost cause who is very much for the wrong cause. lol

0

Hoda 2 years, 10 months ago

Your effeminate tendencies and delusions of intelligence and grandeur are grow more pronounced each day. Your dissatisfaction with your life and general lack of success is implied everytime you feel the need to launch, that which you deem to be sarcastic wise cracks, at strangers online.

0

birdiestrachan 2 years, 10 months ago

The Government also paid severance pay for the Our Lucaya hotel

Hutchison saw the FNM Government for what they are. It was like taking milk from a baby Another bad FNM deal the same as BTC

0

Bobsyeruncle 2 years, 10 months ago

As much as I hate what Hutchison are doing to Freeport, they are after all, a business. I'd like to ask any of you stock market investors out there, whether you would hold on to a stock whose share price had been falling for several years and shows no signs of turning around or issuing a dividend any time in the future?

0

tribanon 2 years, 10 months ago

Yes, for-profit-enterprises are in business to make a profit but this does not somehow relieve them of their legal requirement to satisfy all of their contractual obligations and not just the ones that contribute to their profits.

Both Hutchison Whampoa and the GBPA have business ventures in Grand Bahama that enjoy many overly generous concessions granted to them by government in exchange for investment commitments they made to the Bahamian people, more particularly to Grand Bahamians. Our government never guaranteed Hutchison Whampoa and the GBPA that all of their business ventures in our country would be profitable or that they could just walk away from their significant contractual commitments without consequence or any kind of severe financial penalties if certain of their investments would prove not to be profitable.

0

Hoda 2 years, 10 months ago

Investors walk away everyday. Big and small. You took the airport and land back in the normal course what else would happen? We’re they suppose to leave a profitable business behind for you

0

tribanon 2 years, 10 months ago

They walked away from a major commitment and took the hurricane insurance proceeds with them. So why do you think their profitable operations in Grand Bahama should continue to enjoy overly generous concessions that were granted, renewed and extended by our corrupt politicians?

It's probably better we formulate a plan for taking back (removing) many of the overly generous concessions they continue to enjoy, even if it's at the risk of them packing up their bags and leaving The Bahamas. We would then likely find that we are indeed better off without them or with other foreign investors who at least honour their obligations and may be less inclined to 'grease' our corrupt politicians.

0

Hoda 2 years, 10 months ago

Just try and separate your need to make everything racial political and personal. It’s business. You should similarly advocating for bahamian slum lords who take the insurance money and leave tenants in garbage buildings, business who take the insurance and never reopen, the businesses and employers who owe nib etc.

0

Sign in to comment